A352 offers the Financial Navigator – a software solution designed to enhance the decision-relevant financial data for Mid-Caps and large SMEs. The Financial Navigator combines features of treasury management systems and corporate performance management solutions in one platform. It aims to create transparency for decision makers and finance teams. The Financial Navigator integrates and aggregates all relevant financial information in one platform, enabling collaboration between departments and…
N/A
GTreasury
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
GTreasury offers their treasury management system for funds and transfer management, liquidity tracking, customizable accounting rules with ERP integration, and other liquidity management features.
N/A
SAP Treasury and Risk Management
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
SAP Treasury and Risk Management for enterprises provides enhanced cash and liquidity planning, among other treasury management features.
It is well-suited for providing information about what cash is available and its future outlook of it. It helped us to link the multiple bank accounts that we have globally into one consolidated location. We were then able to ensure that we had the cash required to meet the various business needs that we have.
SAP Risk and Treaury is well suited for corporate industrial use. SAP has accumulted industrial experience of cash management and worth of the 100% money invested cause this fact reduces your time to get ERP treasury project launched as full functional. Needs more customised solution if applied to banks treasury (money market instruments focus, different accounting plan, internal risk management rules). Pricing is the main limitation: available for mostly large corporate and well financed projects but worth every dime spend on it
[In my opinion, the] reporting functions are not user-friendly and [are] very confusing.
[I also believe that the] financial accounting module is also not user-friendly.
Operator security - [In my opinion,] the admin is confusing to set up new groups. Some languages in there were either no longer valid or changed. [Also, I believe that you] cannot disable users unless you move them to disable group. [I feel like it's] a bit weird.
Customer service support - [I feel it has] gotten better but [I, personally,] hope to see more improvement and timely responses.
[I believe] the location of certain functions is confusing as well. [In my experience,] I usually have to go to [the] search bar to search for what I am looking for.
FBAR - [I feel this is] also a bit confusing and hard to find. [In my case,] I had to ask where it is located, and [it was] definitely not where I would have expected it to [be]. I would assume it would be under reporting, but it was under [the] library and then maintenance or something.
It would be nice if all reports could have the same recurrence options (some reports allow for the date range to be the last full month while others require a specific date range).
It is difficult to discontinue some recurring reports that are no longer used.
[I feel] it's too hard to use and navigate around [and] very difficult to manage/administer. We may keep it because [I feel] we [have] already gone through the pain point and don't want to risk going through that again. Unfortunately, if we keep it, [I believe] it's not because we love it.
Good overall usability for what we have needed. We have not delved into any recent upgrades in modules, so there could be better functionality within the system today that we are not currently leveraging. We plan on doing a refresh in 2022 to see where we might be able to take advantage of the recent offerings within the modules we use today.
Weekly meetings and updates a plus Set realistic timeline expectations Have a good project manager Make sure everyone is following the same time line and dependencies list Keep track of a future state or out of scope list You may need to change the scope and do a project request form change, that's OK if you determine a key function has been missed Don't be afraid to extend the timeline to make sure through testing has been done prior to going live Document set up decisions, how reports and worksheets work, and why certain user codes are or are not in the positioning reports.
Simple and far more user-friendly than most other TMS applications I have used in the past. Very strong core TMS foundation and functionality. Addressing some of the known issues and shortfalls would go a long way in taking a much bigger market share from some of the other main players in the TMS space. GTreasury was also very competitive on price and cost-effective.
Some of the edges I have found are [the] following: Risk universe building support and navigation, Transactions back to back stacking and control on [the] roll out if your logic, Integration with risk and compliance dashboard, ease of customizing reporting dashboards both from the perspectives of treasury transactions along with risk Profiling and risk reporting.
Very positive ROI allowing us to take our daily cash target down to 1% of total admitted Assts. Prior to GTreasury we were running close to 20%.
Reduced bank service cost initially by $300,000+ and annually a minimum of $50,000.
Allowed us to maintain and streamline Treasury Staff FTE level, with the ability to train other areas for self service payment research, so the Treasury Analyst can focus on value added analysis tasks.
