ACCELQ vs. OwlityAI

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ACCELQ
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
ACCELQ is an agile quality management platform that helps users achieve continuous delivery for web, mobile, manual testing, and APIs. It can be used to write and manage manual test cases for the functionality that may be too fluid for automation.N/A
OwlityAI
Score 0.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
An autonomous AI-driven QA solution. Owlity boasts 15 years of experience in AI QA SaaS, and a solution that clearly knows what, when and how to test. The user doesn't have to have any QA knowledge. By putting a URL of a web app, OwlityAI produces a test report. The solution is presented as simple and comprehensive.
$299
per month
Pricing
ACCELQOwlityAI
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Core
$299
per month
Pro
$799
per month
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ACCELQOwlityAI
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
ACCELQOwlityAI
Automation Testing
Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
ACCELQ
8.9
1 Ratings
5% above category average
OwlityAI
-
Ratings
Record and Automate9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Browser Testing8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Testing8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Test Scheduling10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Test Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
CI/CD Tool Integration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrated Version Control10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Parallel Testing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Object Recognition10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Data-Driven Testing9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Testing Collaboration7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Real Device Testing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ACCELQOwlityAI
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.4 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.4 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ACCELQOwlityAI
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ACCELQOwlityAI
Likelihood to Recommend
ACCELQ
Low code test automation, Ready to pickup platform without having much prior knowledge on automation, AI agent interactions are nearly close to real life scenarios, best API automation scale it has got, QGPT logic builder has really changed the talk with DBs in AI way, Logic insights feature is really impressive to identify possible risk while just started developing web apps.
Read full review
Owlity
No answers on this topic
Pros
ACCELQ
  • Scriptless and hence coding is easy.
  • Maintenance of the scripts are easy.
  • Learning curve is small.
Read full review
Owlity
No answers on this topic
Cons
ACCELQ
  • Visual regression features
  • Test generation from UI and UX platforms like Figma
  • Manual test tools can be more integrated with AutoPilot
Read full review
Owlity
No answers on this topic
Usability
ACCELQ
Features like low code, API automation, auto pilot and free account creations, case studies are better suited for my business into IOT space, some of the enterprise automation features are truly game changer in productivity for my team. Database migration was supported seamlessly while opted for ACCELQ solutions.
Read full review
Owlity
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
ACCELQ
When we implemented ACCELQ, we conducted POCs with many similar solutions. Among the tools we pursued at that time, accelQ stood out against Tricentis Tosca and QMetry automation studio. However, subject 7 did better. However, they were still in the nascent stages of building the tool, and hence we did not pick it.
Read full review
Owlity
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
ACCELQ
  • Overall adoption of an automation tool went up.
  • Migration of existing selenium scripts to ACCELQ was relatively easy and less effort.
  • Lack of overall admin console and hence managing the agents across different execution is difficult.
  • Integration between accelQ and any test management tool can be difficult and buggy in most cases, even though it can be coded.
Read full review
Owlity
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

OwlityAI Screenshots

Screenshot of Dashboard