AccessPatrol by CurrentWare vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

AccessPatrol by CurrentWare

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
AccessPatrol by CurrentWare	Score 6.0 out of 10	N/A	AccessPatrol by CurrentWare provides a solution for securing company endpoints against data breaches caused by illicit data transfers and rogue USB devices. AccessPatrol can be used to block flash drives, cell phones, tablets, Bluetooth, and more. File operations alerts and permissions can be configured to alert IT administrators to suspicious file operations and proactively prevent data transfers by unauthorized users.	$72 per year per user
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention	Score 7.4 out of 10	N/A	Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is used to provide intelligent detection and control of sensitive information across Office 365, OneDrive, SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, and on the endpoint. It also helps prevent data loss through identifying and preventing risky or inappropriate sharing, transfer, or use of sensitive data on endpoints, apps, and services.	N/A

Pricing

AccessPatrol by CurrentWare

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Editions & Modules

10-99 Users: $6
per month (billed annually) per user
100+ Users: Volume & prepurchase discounts available. Please contact sales for info.
Per User Per Month

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
AccessPatrol by CurrentWare	Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

Pricing is based on the volume of licenses purchased. There are additional discounts available for educational organizations, non-profits, managed services providers, and businesses that pre-purchase multiple-year plans.

—

More Pricing Information

Features

AccessPatrol by CurrentWare

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Data Preparation

Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
	AccessPatrol by CurrentWare - Ratings	Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention 8.7 8 Ratings 13% above category average
Data Encryption	00 Ratings	8.78 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	AccessPatrol by CurrentWare	Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Small Businesses	Paubox Email Suite Score 9.0 out of 10	Paubox Email Suite Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Druva Security Cloud Score 9.5 out of 10	Druva Security Cloud Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises	Druva Security Cloud Score 9.5 out of 10	Druva Security Cloud Score 9.5 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	AccessPatrol by CurrentWare	Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	7.9 (14 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	1.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	AccessPatrol by CurrentWare	Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Likelihood to Recommend	CurrentWare Inc. No answers on this topic	Microsoft I would highly recommend Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention for companies that are utilizing Microsoft technologies based on the strong integrations. If a company is using other technologies (e.g Google Workspace), then Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention would not be a good fit and would be difficult to implement/manage. Incentivized PM Peter Marshall Director, Information Security and Compliance Read full review
Pros	CurrentWare Inc. No answers on this topic	Microsoft Automatic labeling, once we've trained the naming conventions and things like that and we get the labels placed on things. One of the biggest problems that our clients face is the fact that they don't particularly know every single time exactly the data that they're trying to protect, how to identify it when it comes into the system or when they create it, right? So we're using Purview and we're using the abilities that Purview has to auto-label things based off of either taxonomy that you have produced or created or that have been automatically populated through AI. That makes it a lot easier and kind of thwarts possible user error that causes problems for organizations. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	CurrentWare Inc. No answers on this topic	Microsoft Overall, Microsoft DLP is not my number one choice because there's not much flexibility. There's a lot of restrictions and the way they set up rules a lot really restrictive. Thus it takes a lot more time for my team to build the rules and establish the controls as needed. So it's very clunky in that way and they have not improved it over the years, but I know they're trying to get a better, however it takes time because Microsoft, as we all knows, not a really security centric company. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	CurrentWare Inc. No answers on this topic	Microsoft Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is super difficult. Incentivized CH Chris Hein Information Technology Director Read full review
Alternatives Considered	CurrentWare Inc. No answers on this topic	Microsoft There are much more comprehensive and granular DLP solutions out there like Trellix and Sophos but ultimately they are expensive and require significant administrative oversight for implementation and deployment. For a company of our size, they are just not economically feasible. We purchased out 365 E5 tenant with Purview DLP integration from a reseller at a price that we couldn't compete with vs a standalone enterprise product. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	CurrentWare Inc. No answers on this topic	Microsoft It has helped us to prevent data breaches and protect them from data loss. It has strong visibility on the activities related to data copy to and from removable devices. It can easily enforce the policies on group of users and also exclude some in the exclusions Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	AccessPatrol by CurrentWare Screenshots	Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Screenshots