Advarra OnCore vs. Bioclinica ICL

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Advarra OnCore
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
OnCore, from Advarra in Columbia (formerly known as Forte Research Systems) provides automated clinical research support featuring, billing and financial management, specimen management, reporting, effort tracking, and integration into other clinical systems.N/A
Bioclinica ICL
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
BioClinica ICL is that company's imagine core lab service, which supports clinical trials with imaging services.N/A
Pricing
Advarra OnCoreBioclinica ICL
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Advarra OnCoreBioclinica ICL
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
User Ratings
Advarra OnCoreBioclinica ICL
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Advarra OnCoreBioclinica ICL
Likelihood to Recommend
Advarra (formerly Forte Research System)
Advarra is well suited for monitoring the progress of the clinical trials for a research organization. It's biggest advantage is the fact that the participants details and accrual monitoring shows the progress of the clinical trial. OnCore provides the capability of creating and using study calendars and especially monitoring and tracking participants visits. OnCore may be less appropriate to use in regards to grants and funds tracking.
Read full review
Bioclinica
BioClinica ICL is well suited for meeting the requirements for regulatory filling and submission support, imagining collection and QC, centralized independent review for consistency purposes, site training and imagining archiving and sharing. The Bioclinica team also assist you with creating the database based on the protocol and study design. Bioclinical ICL has all the features to meet the requirements for medical imagining but they can ensure that their interface is more intuitive and easy to use.
Read full review
Pros
Advarra (formerly Forte Research System)
No answers on this topic
Bioclinica
  • The system is very easy to use by the end user. Uploading of images by the site is a very streamlined process
  • BioClinica has the capability to centrally read the CT scan images by their own internal radiologist for consistency purposes
  • BioClinica has a very good customer service and helpline
Read full review
Cons
Advarra (formerly Forte Research System)
No answers on this topic
Bioclinica
  • Report generating should be more robust and up to date. Clinical trial sites receive multiple queries for the same images even after the sites have responded to the same query.
  • The webiste to upload images by the site is good but I have used other similar software which is more intuitive and easy to maneuver.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Advarra (formerly Forte Research System)
I have not used nor evaluated any other products similar to Advarra OnCore. Did not participate in the selection process.
Read full review
Bioclinica
Parexel also has the capability to collect medical images in a central repository database. Parexel's uploading website is very intuitive and very easy to use. BioClinica can easily ensure that their uploading website is more user-friendly and the interface is easy to understand. Overall Bioclinica ICL is a very good option for pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Advarra (formerly Forte Research System)
No answers on this topic
Bioclinica
  • BioClinica ICL was able to meet our protocol and study design to create a central repository of all the images collected by the sites
  • It ensured timely filling of study data to regulatory by ensuring the images data are submitted to regulatory authority as supporting documents
  • It ensured that sites were able to upload imagining documents without extra burden on them
Read full review
ScreenShots