Aerospike vs. Riak

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Aerospike
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
The Aerospike Real-time Data Platform aims to enable organizations to act instantly across billions of transactions while reducing server footprint up to 80%. The vendor states Aerospike multi-cloud platform powers real-time applications with predictable sub-millisecond performance up to petabyte scale with five-nines uptime with globally distributed, consistent data. Aerospike boasts customers such as Airtel, Experian, European Central Bank, Nielsen, PayPal, Snap, Verizon Media and Wayfair.N/A
Riak
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Riak is a NoSQL database from Basho Technologies in Bellevue, Washington.N/A
Pricing
AerospikeRiak
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AerospikeRiak
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AerospikeRiak
Considered Both Products
Aerospike
Chose Aerospike
From a scale and performance perspective, Aerospike is the best. The ability to power large scale deployments on much less hardware than the other database similar to Aerospike is a huge bonus. Also, even if you have more data, performance doesn't degrade.
Chose Aerospike
Aerospike is much more performant than MongoDB, however there is much greater community adoption and support for mongo
Chose Aerospike
Compared to the above for K/V lookups and writes, it is faster. However, less than 1 MB, i'd use redis, if you're willing to write package for HA in redis. However HA between redis and aerospike, aerospike is top notch. K/V lookups were 20-30% faster than Redis, 50% faster …
Riak
Chose Riak
MongoDB seems to have copied a lot of functionality from Riak. This may be because MongoDB hired a number of former Basho engineers when Basho went bankrupt. That said, the new functions added to Riak after it became open source have successfully differentiated itself from …
Chose Riak
Every database has positives and negatives. Redis is very good at set operations, but not as good at executing fast queries. MongoDB is a much cheaper data store than Riak, but not as highly available and scalable. Searching Riak is also faster than searching MongoDB or …
Chose Riak
Because of the RESTful HTTP interface, the consistency model, and because of the catalog-driven data model, Riak was an easy win over Redis and Memcached.
Chose Riak
At the time I worked on the project those were the three competing technologies I evaluated. Couchbase didn't have memcache integrated at the time. Riak was by far the easiest to set up, and it's linking capability struck the right balance of having just enough relational …
Chose Riak
Riak is a key/value pair store which is great for certain use cases. For our use case, the ability to search is an extremely useful feature. Apache Cassandra can provide this while Riak cannot. Also again for our use case, the ability to delete is critical as we strive to …
Features
AerospikeRiak
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
Aerospike
9.9
Ratings
12% above category average
Riak
9.4
Ratings
7% above category average
Performance10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Availability10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Concurrency10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Security10.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Scalability10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Data model flexibility10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AerospikeRiak
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AerospikeRiak
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.9
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AerospikeRiak
Likelihood to Recommend
We were developing an advertisement time auction application, where we had to store the client's personal details, advertisement-related details, location, and many other details. Moreover, we required a promotion, cookies, and a few more details from the front end. All this information is heavy in terms of size and cannot be lost if the server crash. So, we required an extremely fast disk database with high scalability and low throughput.
Read full review
Riak is very good if you need a resilient data store that can handle large amounts of documents very fast. If you have 1,000,000 documents and need to execute complex queries, it is great. Riak's SOLR engine is fast, however if you have extremely high amount of queries in a very limited time range, it can fail in a bad way.
Read full review
Pros
  • featured with robustness and reliability
  • low hardware resource consumption especially RAM
  • open-source
  • distributed no-sql server
Read full review
  • Reliability -- we rarely have to do anything to maintain our Riak instance. It is just online and available for whatever we throw at it.
  • The Riak Python client is an excellent tool and handles parallel writes/reads very well
  • There is a large and very receptive community or Riak users and developers who seem to be able to help with most technical questions that have arisen.
Read full review
Cons
  • AQL is pretty limited and not as useful as the java client
  • Documentation can be lacking for some products
  • replication configuration is complicated
Read full review
  • Missing a free text search function
  • More security work
  • Multi-tenant reporting
  • More types of index optimised for different structures
  • Automating repairs especially after unclean shutdowns
  • WebDAV/Samba shares for Riak CS
  • Implementing the SQL queries from Riak TS in Riak KV
  • Settable replication bandwidth caps
  • Safemode start up after failure
  • More client integrations
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
If money isn't an issue, and you're not on the cloud, then I'd go with Aerospike. If you're the cloud ie, aws or azure, then i'd stick with dynamoDB or Cosmos then. Aerospike is definitely not something you want to put into the cloud. It doesn't work well w/ cross regions. If cross DC, you'll have to write some stuff for data integrity checks.
Read full review
Riak works great for our use case but the fact that deletes seem to resurrect is a real issue for us. Unless we can get this solved, we'll continue to look at other products to see if our use case fits. Otherwise Riak is a great product and it fits our use case 95%. We have found work arounds to the remaining 5%.
Read full review
Usability
Could be easier to use and install. Also developer experience needs some work
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
We used the community edition.
Read full review
Despite Basho going bankrupt and the project becoming fully open-source, community support is reasonably good, albeit a little slow at times. Paid enterprise-grade support is also available from former Basho engineers but the same company also contributes to the community support for free for basic questions or specific knowledge areas.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Aerospike is much more performant than MongoDB, however there is much greater community adoption and support for mongo
Read full review
MongoDB seems to have copied a lot of functionality from Riak. This may be because MongoDB hired a number of former Basho engineers when Basho went bankrupt. That said, the new functions added to Riak after it became open source have successfully differentiated itself from MongoDB.
Amazon S3 is a nice tool but when you are at significant scale with regionally specific data (joys of GDPR), it's much easier to keep it in house and Riak CS lets you do exactly that. All you need to do is point your application at Riak CS instead of Amazon S3 and it just works as if nothing has changed.
When we evaluated against Cassandra, we found the tools available did not match our needs at the time.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Being able to power the same workload on a fraction of the servers has led to better ROI for my application.
  • Less servers needed also meant less time to manage the cluster, leading to savings in engineering time
Read full review
  • Riak's simple API and simple management model made it a no brainer when it came to adopting it as a technology for the team.
Read full review
ScreenShots