Agari Active Defense vs. SecurityScorecard

In the case of an on going or retro active phishing attack, Agari Active Defense does extremely well in identifying the participants. Also, Agari Active Defense is capable of removing any of the detected items from the recipients inbox while blocking the senders and prevent any future entries. The variety of the emails continue to enter many organizations and Agari Active Defense helps stand as a first line of defense against phishing.

Incentivized

Good:

* Initial recognition of perimeter

* Discovery of shadow IT assets

* Get nice reports to set baselines and objectives for your customers

Bad

* Does not provide threat intel as another tool

* Not enough documentation for the API or to automate scenarios

Incentivized

• Phishing detection
• VIP or HVT alerts
• Tactics and Intel

Incentivized

• Security Ratings
• Security Assessments
• Reporting Center

Incentivized

• Raw data extraction
• Reporting for Executives
• Clustering

Incentivized

• Pricing could be reviewed for specific industries which were more impacted by the pandemic situation.

Incentivized

Agari Active Defense hold true to its name. As a products that performs in the first line of defense it is capable of determining certain times as malicious and preventing from enter the enterprise. With easy to use functions and tuning the product is capable to adjust to the environment and act on command of an analyst as threat are detected.

Incentivized

n/a

Incentivized

• Mitigation of risk in regards to Phishing
• Cost of maintenance on SOC tool
• Features are easy and training is acceptable

Incentivized

• Get insights about our external security posture
• Actionable tasks to solve

Incentivized