Airmeet vs. Castr

We never could really find a scenario where Airmeet really excelled over other major conferencing and webinar platforms. Especially post-COVID. It seemed overly complicated to set up an event and their support was somewhat difficult to deal with. The major platforms, conversely, made many improvements at a fraction marketed at a fraction of the cost. So most of Airmeet is really gimmicky from my experience. The students found it somewhat cumbersome.

• Speakers can join a "stage" and can be toggled on and off
• The audience can interact via chat box, sending emojis and "claps," Q&A with speakers, and 1:1 and group messages.
• Customized banners and stages with your brand
• One website for registration + event info + event recap including video replay

Incentivized

• Number of people that can be added to your organization team at the backend
• Speed networking interface and customization
• Booth interaction with attendees

Incentivized

It was always a bit cumbersome to use. It was a great concept but poorly executed.

Airmeet certainly has capabilities that for networking and engagement that I don't feel are matched in other platforms.

Incentivized

• We had 80-100 attendees per offline event, and by moving online with Airmeet, we regularly had 200-300 attendees per event.
• We were able to invite 10x more investors from overseas since it was online
• Able to quickly and easily market the event with a single link

Incentivized