TrustRadius

Akamai API Gateway vs. digiRunner

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Akamai API Gateway
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
Akamai offers their API Gateway, touting easy control and access to enterprise applications via their services.N/A
digiRunner
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
digiRunner is an enterprise-level API management platform compliant with Open API Specification (OAS). It connects existing APIs and supports multiple API formats, providing enterprises with API lifecycle management tools. digiRunner facilitates information security management, monitoring management, access and authority control, transaction security management, and big data processing, as well as providing varied analysis reports for maximum insight. digiRunner not only assists in the…N/A
Pricing
Akamai API GatewaydigiRunner
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Akamai API GatewaydigiRunner
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Akamai API GatewaydigiRunner
Considered Both Products
Akamai API Gateway
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Akamai API Gateway
Akamai [API Gateway] helps better in terms of representation of graphQL and its consumption in monitoring system making a package for deployment speed with monitoring and scaling application with all services and utilizing most of a system without much knowledge of other …
digiRunner

No answer on this topic

Features
Akamai API GatewaydigiRunner
API Management
Comparison of API Management features of Product A and Product B
Akamai API Gateway
7.7
Ratings
9% below category average
digiRunner
-
Ratings
API access control8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Rate limits and usage policies7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
API usage data8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
API user onboarding8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
API versioning7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Usage billing and payments7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
API monitoring and logging9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Akamai API GatewaydigiRunner
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Akamai API GatewaydigiRunner
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Akamai API GatewaydigiRunner
Likelihood to Recommend
It is really helpful for managing [the] scaling of systems with need and utilizing resources when needed. Also, DevOps support for deployment plans is quite useful when deploying applications. Monitoring systems with graphQL and utilizing them in APIs is quite helpful when used in Microservices systems to identify system capabilities and user utilization of applications.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Graphically representation in GraphQL
  • Scaling system
  • DevOps management
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Quota enforcement can be simplified
  • Caching mechanism for API with akamai can be improved
  • Gateway configuration can be simplified as details are not much elaborate
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Akamai [API Gateway] helps better in terms of representation of graphQL and its consumption in monitoring system making a package for deployment speed with monitoring and scaling application with all services and utilizing most of a system without much knowledge of other aspects. Also, [a] user-friendly system helps people to handle [the] system with necessary options
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Decrease in time required for deployment and monitoring by significant amount causing less support resources needed
  • Scaling applications on month-end at high usage time has reduced TAT time for issues and no of issues occurring
  • Quota enforcement has allowed [managing] multiple systems and their needs in respective stakeholders hands and reduced infra teams involvement in [the] management of reoccurring problems
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

digiRunner Screenshots

Screenshot of the digiRunner login page