Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. NGINX
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation | Score9.3 out of 10 | N/A | Guardicore is a segmentation company, now part of Akamai since the late 2021 acquisition, aiming to displace legacy firewalls. The Guardiocre software-only approach is decoupled from the physical network to provide a faster alternative to firewalls. It is built for the agile enterprise that offers greater security and visibility in the cloud, data-center and endpoint. | N/A |
NGINX | Score9.1 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | NGINX, a business unit of F5 Networks, powers over 65% of the world's busiest websites and web applications. NGINX started out as an open source web server and reverse proxy, built to be faster and more efficient than Apache. Over the years, NGINX has built a suite of infrastructure software products o tackle some of the biggest challenges in managing high-transaction applications. NGINX offers a suite of products to form the core of what organizations need to create… | N/A |
| Akamai Guardicore Segmentation | NGINX | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Akamai Guardicore Segmentation | NGINX | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Would buy again 49 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 45 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 50 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 34 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Implementation went as expected 43 Answers | |
| Akamai Guardicore Segmentation | NGINX | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Akamai Guardicore Segmentation | NGINX | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) Score9 out of 10 | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Cisco IOS Security Score9.6 out of 10 | Red Hat JBoss EAP Score8.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Akamai Guardicore Segmentation | NGINX | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 9.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | 9.0 | 8.3 |
| Support Rating | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.0 |
| Akamai Guardicore Segmentation | NGINX | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | NGINX Screenshots |









