Overall Satisfaction with NGINX
Many [NGINX] servers are used across the organization to load balance and serve content before hitting our nodejs express rest api backends or our node react express frontends. It helps maintain uptime when we encounter strange deployment errors that can take out one of our servers. In my experience is has provided amazing throughput with very little configuration.
- Performance
- Reliability
- Low configuration
- Rarely used in development
- Difficult to tell if it changed values from a server behind it
- Performance
- Load balancing
- Reliability
- It lets you focus on the hard part of web dev and not devops
- There can be increased complexity by splitting up which servers do which processes
- Increased reliability with load balancing
I have found that [NGINX] seems to perform better throughout the years with less issues although I've used Apache more. I would definitely recommend [NGINX] for any high volume site and I've seen this to usually be the case from most provided web hosts who will pick [NGINX] over alternatives
Do you think NGINX delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with NGINX's feature set?
Yes
Did NGINX live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of NGINX go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy NGINX again?
Yes