AllegroGraph vs. Apache HBase

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AllegroGraph
Scoreย 5.0ย outย ofย 10
N/A
According to the vendor, AllegroGraph is a database technology that enables businesses to extract sophisticated decision insights and predictive analytics from highly complex, distributed data that cannot be uncovered with conventional databases. Unlike traditional relational databases or other NoSQL databases, AllegroGraph employs semantic graph technologies that process data with contextual and conceptual intelligence. AllegroGraph is able run queries of unprecedented complexity to supportโ€ฆN/A
HBase
Scoreย 7.3ย outย ofย 10
N/A
The Apache HBase project's goal is the hosting of very large tables -- billions of rows X millions of columns -- atop clusters of commodity hardware. Apache HBase is an open-source, distributed, versioned, non-relational database modeled after Google's Bigtable.N/A
Pricing
AllegroGraphApache HBase
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AllegroGraphHBase
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Detailsโ€”โ€”
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AllegroGraphApache HBase
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
AllegroGraphApache HBase
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
AllegroGraph
-
Ratings
Apache HBase
7.7
5 Ratings
13% below category average
Performance00 Ratings7.15 Ratings
Availability00 Ratings7.85 Ratings
Concurrency00 Ratings7.05 Ratings
Security00 Ratings7.85 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings8.65 Ratings
Data model flexibility00 Ratings7.15 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility00 Ratings8.25 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AllegroGraphApache HBase
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Scoreย 8.3ย outย ofย 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Scoreย 8.3ย outย ofย 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Scoreย 8.3ย outย ofย 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Scoreย 8.3ย outย ofย 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Scoreย 8.3ย outย ofย 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Scoreย 8.3ย outย ofย 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AllegroGraphApache HBase
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(10 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(10 ratings)
User Testimonials
AllegroGraphApache HBase
Likelihood to Recommend
Franz Inc.
No answers on this topic
Apache
Hbase is well suited for large organizations with millions of operations performing on tables, real-time lookup of records in a table, range queries, random reads and writes and online analytics operations. Hbase cannot be replaced for traditional databases as it cannot support all the features, CPU and memory intensive. Observed increased latency when using with MapReduce job joins.
Read full review
Pros
Franz Inc.
No answers on this topic
Apache
  • Scalability. HBase can scale to trillions of records.
  • Fast. HBase is extremely fast to scan values or retrieve individual records by key.
  • HBase can be accessed by standard SQL via Apache Phoenix.
  • Integrated. I can easily store and retrieve data from HBase using Apache Spark.
  • It is easy to set up DR and backups.
  • Ingest. It is easy to ingest data into HBase via shell, Java, Apache NiFi, Storm, Spark, Flink, Python and other means.
Read full review
Cons
Franz Inc.
No answers on this topic
Apache
  • There are very few commands in HBase.
  • Stored procedures functionality is not available so it should be implemented.
  • HBase is CPU and Memory intensive with large sequential input or output access while as Map Reduce jobs are primarily input or output bound with fixed memory. HBase integrated with Map-reduce jobs will result in random latencies.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Franz Inc.
No answers on this topic
Apache
There's really not anything else out there that I've seen comparable for my use cases. HBase has never proven me wrong. Some companies align their whole business on HBase and are moving all of their infrastructure from other database engines to HBase. It's also open source and has a very collaborative community.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Franz Inc.
No answers on this topic
Apache
Cassandra os great for writes. But with large datasets, depending, not as great as HBASE. Cassandra does support parquet now. HBase still performance issues. Cassandra has use cases of being used as time series. HBase, it fails miserably. GeoSpatial data, Hbase does work to an extent. HA between the two are almost the same.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Franz Inc.
No answers on this topic
Apache
  • As Hbase is a noSql database, here we don't have transaction support and we cannot do many operations on the data.
  • Not having the feature of primary or a composite primary key is an issue as the architecture to be defined cannot be the same legacy type. Also the transaction concept is not applicable here.
  • The way data is printed on console is not so user-friendly. So we had to use some abstraction over HBase (eg apache phoenix) which means there is one new component to handle.
Read full review
ScreenShots

AllegroGraph Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of