Amazon CloudFront vs. Tanzu tc Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon CloudFront
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
CloudFront is the content delivery network (CDN) from Amazon Web Services.
$0.02
Tanzu tc Server
Score 6.1 out of 10
N/A
The Tanzu tc Server is a Lightweight Java application server that extends Apache Tomcat for use in large-scale mission-critical environments.N/A
Pricing
Amazon CloudFrontTanzu tc Server
Editions & Modules
Over 5PB
$0.02
Next 524TB
$0.03
Next 4PB
$0.03
Next 350TB
$0.04
Next 100TB
$0.06
Next 40TB
$0.08
First 10TB
$0.09
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon CloudFrontTanzu tc Server
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon CloudFrontTanzu tc Server
Features
Amazon CloudFrontTanzu tc Server
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Amazon CloudFront
-
Ratings
Tanzu tc Server
7.8
1 Ratings
2% below category average
IDE support00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Security management00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Administration and management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Application server performance00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Installation00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon CloudFrontTanzu tc Server
Small Businesses
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.8 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.8 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Azure CDN
Azure CDN
Score 7.6 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon CloudFrontTanzu tc Server
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(17 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon CloudFrontTanzu tc Server
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
Amazon CloudFront is the perfect solution for any type of company. If a company is small or medium size, CloudFront offers 1 TB monthly free bandwidth which is more than for any small and medium size companies. If we compare the speed of CloudFront with other CDN, CloudFront is way ahead of their competitors and with 1 TB free bandwidth. If someone is ready to invest time in CloudFront documentation then he/she definitely go for it.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
-Pivotal tc Server is best used as web application server on a virtual machine for middleware purposes -I feel it is less appropriate to be used with utilizing data that does not need to be secure
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • if a website’s static data are based in New York City, people in Boston will get the content faster than people in San Francisco or Tokyo. The farther away customers are from a company’s data center, the slower the website or application loads. This problem can be fixed with a content delivery network like Amazon CloudFront
  • When a visitor requests a file from your website, Amazon CloudFront automatically sends the request to a copy of the file at the nearest edge location. This results in faster download times.
  • You may have great hosting but it doesn’t have the capacity or scalability offered by Google, Microsoft or Yahoo. The better CDNs like Amazon CloudFront offer higher availability, lower network latency and lower packet loss.
  • Amazon CloudFront provides 24/7 email and phone support
  • Amazon CloudFront Free Tier allows you to free up to 50 GB of data transfer and 2,000,000 HTTP and HTTPS requests / month for one year.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
  • send a receive HL7 message securely
  • details issues and errors in logs
  • very reliable uptime record with no system crashes
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • Kinda of costlier when compared to rivals providing the same service
  • The setup of Distribution is kinda little complicated, need good exposure before setting up the service
  • Sometimes we can go with S3 Delivery service rather than Cloudfront if the website is providing static content and its way cheaper
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
  • User management and administration access account setup has room for improvement and can be more user friendly and clearly list how many admin accounts we can setup
  • password complexity for user accounts need to be updated
  • although all logs list all errors some of the tomcat errors are not time stamped
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
Easy way to integrate a CDN within the AWS infrastructure. It allows further customization based on company needs.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Amazon AWS
CloudFront is a good CDN solution. It can be a bit complicated to implement depending on your needs, but AWS tech support is great. You get to avoid a ton of upfront costs by going with CloudFront. It works best in conjunction with other AWS services in your infrastructure. Once you set it up, you won't need to do much to maintain it. It just works.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
Amazon has always been creative and leading, and I have been using its services for years. They are very reassuring and have fast and responsive support--you can call them from any time zone to respond quickly. High security on servers, open hands on changes, and increasing and decreasing server resources and features.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
We selected Pivotal tc Server opposed to Cent0s Linux because Pivotal tc Server is more reliable and causes less downtime , also better logging. I have used both
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • RoI for using CloudFront is immense. You can use it for all your certificate management and static asset management of your websites using CloudFront.
  • It is as good or better than any other CDN provider with multi-region support across the world using AWS regions.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
  • one positive is that we can securely send patient data across to our food service dept.
  • another positive is that we can integrate the communication with our patient tv terminals
  • third positive is that there is less downtime because it is reliable
Read full review
ScreenShots