Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) vs. IBM Cloud Private

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon EKS
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) is a managed container service to run and scale Kubernetes applications in the cloud or on-premises, available on AWS or on-premise through Amazon EKS Anywhere.
$0.10
per hour of each cluster created
IBM Cloud Private
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Private is a Kubernetes-based container platform allowing users to build cloud-native applications on their own infrastructure. In addition, it offers common services for self-service deployment, monitoring, logging and security, as well as middleware, data and analytics.N/A
Pricing
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)IBM Cloud Private
Editions & Modules
Amazon EKS Cluster
$.10
per hour of each cluster created
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon EKSIBM Cloud Private
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)IBM Cloud Private
Considered Both Products
Amazon EKS
Chose Amazon EKS
Depends on the public cloud using and better integrations within the cloud native services. Using AWS cloud for majority of the platform so it was better to use the same vendor service
Chose Amazon EKS
It feels like AWS is behind the EKS race, the only advantage I'm able to see right now is the support of IPv6, however, trying to promote AWS alternatives that are different from the market and more like a vendor locking solutions like ECS/Fargate have kept AWS behind and …
IBM Cloud Private
Chose IBM Cloud Private
With VMware cloud, each VMware Cloud customer must have an SDDC account(VMC) as well as a general AWS account. The two accounts must be linked for the service to work which is a tiresome thing to do for some clients but with IBM Cloud Private all these issues are solved.
Features
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)IBM Cloud Private
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
8.9
Ratings
9% above category average
IBM Cloud Private
-
Ratings
Security and Isolation9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Container Orchestration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cluster Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Storage Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Discovery Tools8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
-
Ratings
IBM Cloud Private
9.7
Ratings
22% above category average
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)IBM Cloud Private
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.8 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)IBM Cloud Private
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)IBM Cloud Private
Likelihood to Recommend
Well suited for microservices architecture but can be a bit costly if less number of microservices or monolithic architecture hosted to be hosted on containers. Use of hybrid cluster instances also works well using both normal and fargate instances. Also the integration of audit and diagnostic logs of master nodes helps to reduce the unwanted access related issues.
Read full review
IBM Cloud Private is well suited for SaaS models.
Read full review
Pros
  • Upgrade the kubernetes clusters to the latest version with a single click
  • Auto scaling policies to automatically scale the nodes
  • Detailed logs and events on the cluster within the EKS clusters portal, cloudwatch logs and metrics
Read full review
  • There is a large variety of services available on IBM Cloud.
  • This is my first experience with a PaaS and I haven’t had any major problems navigating around it.
  • It is easy to deploy applications and services on IBM Cloud.
Read full review
Cons
  • AWSIAM integration with Kubernetes RBAC could be better.
  • Enabling some add-ons like service mesh, and monitoring will be nice instead of having to install them yourself after the creation of the cluster.
  • EKS bootstrap time could be faster ...
Read full review
  • More hands on training outside of virtual classes would be helpful.
Read full review
Usability
Cluster maintanence is reduced, easier to deploy resources, great observability insights
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
It feels like AWS is behind the EKS race, the only advantage I'm able to see right now is the support of IPv6, however, trying to promote AWS alternatives that are different from the market and more like a vendor locking solutions like ECS/Fargate have kept AWS behind and focusing on the wrong things. EKS needs to really improve its integration with the Kubernetes ecosystem and have an enterprise solution for monitoring, backups, and service mesh.
Read full review
With VMware cloud, each VMware Cloud customer must have an SDDC account(VMC) as well as a general AWS account. The two accounts must be linked for the service to work which is a tiresome thing to do for some clients but with IBM Cloud Private all these issues are solved.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Migrating all our workloads from ec2 VMs to containers running in Kubernetes has been a huge improvement for the management and resilience of our Infrastructure.
  • EKS Upgrade process to a new version seems to be taking very long ....
  • EKS creation time usually takes over 10 minutes in us-east-1, we would like faster creation times to be under 5 minutes.
Read full review
  • N/A
  • N/A
  • N/A
Read full review
ScreenShots