TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Amazon Quick Sight

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AAmazon Quick Sight is a cloud-based Business Intelligence (BI) service within Amazon Quick. It connects enterprise data sources to interactive dashboards, visualizations, natural-language analysis, and analytics workflows.

    $24

    per month per user

    Mathematica

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AWolfram's flagship product Mathematica is a modern technical computing application featuring a flexible symbolic coding language and a wide array of graphing and data visualization capabilities.

    $1,520

    per year

    Pricing
    Amazon Quick SightMathematica
    Editions & Modules
    Reader
    $3
    per month per user
    Author
    $24
    per month per user
    Reader Pro
    $24
    per month per user
    Author Pro
    $50
    per month per user
    Standard Cloud
    $1,520
    per year
    Standard Desktop
    $3,040
    one-time fee
    Standard Desktop & Cloud
    $3,344
    one-time fee
    Mathematica Enterprise Edition
    $8,150.00
    one-time fee
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Amazon Quick SightMathematica
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsProspective buyers can also purchase a set number of sessions or questions in lieu of a monthly subscription.Discounts available for students and educational institutions. The Network Edition reduce per-user license costs through shared deployment across any number of machines on a local-area network.
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Amazon Quick SightMathematica
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Amazon Quick Sight and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Amazon Quick Sight
    10.0
    6 Ratings
    20% above category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.9
    6 Ratings
    20% above category average
    Pixel Perfect reports10.05 Ratings9.84 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards10.06 Ratings9.94 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates10.06 Ratings9.96 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Amazon Quick Sight and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Amazon Quick Sight
    10.0
    6 Ratings
    22% above category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.9
    9 Ratings
    23% above category average
    Drill-down analysis10.06 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities10.06 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages10.04 Ratings9.97 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration10.06 Ratings9.99 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Amazon Quick Sight and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Amazon Quick Sight
    8.4
    6 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.3
    8 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Publish to Web8.03 Ratings9.97 Ratings
    Publish to PDF10.03 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Report Versioning10.05 Ratings9.97 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling7.04 Ratings8.95 Ratings
    Delivery to Remote Servers7.03 Ratings8.95 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Amazon Quick Sight and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Amazon Quick Sight
    10.0
    6 Ratings
    22% above category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.9
    9 Ratings
    24% above category average
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)10.06 Ratings9.99 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization10.05 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics10.03 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Pattern Recognition and Data Mining10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Amazon Quick Sight and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Amazon Quick Sight
    10.0
    6 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    Multi-User Support (named login)10.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Role-Based Security Model10.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)10.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report-Level Access Control10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Amazon Quick Sight and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Amazon Quick Sight
    3.9
    4 Ratings
    66% below category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    Responsive Design for Web Access4.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Application3.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile3.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
    Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Amazon Quick Sight and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Amazon Quick Sight
    6.0
    3 Ratings
    25% below category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    REST API6.12 Ratings00 Ratings
    Javascript API6.62 Ratings00 Ratings
    iFrames7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Java API6.12 Ratings00 Ratings
    Themeable User Interface (UI)7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizable Platform (Open Source)3.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Amazon Quick SightMathematica
    Small Businesses
    Cyfe
    Score4 out of 10
    Chartio (discontinued)
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Zendesk Explore
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Jet Reports
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Jaspersoft Community Edition
    Score7 out of 10
    Kibana
    Score8.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Amazon Quick SightMathematica
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (6 ratings)
    9.9
    (9 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.5
    (2 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    7.1
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Data Sources
    7.1
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Amazon Quick SightMathematica
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    Amazon Quicksight is a truly cloud-based solution so it works perfectly fine and saves a lot of expense in terms of hardware and maintenance. We can maintain it by ourselves by giving commands on UI. If you have connectivity issues then it can cause headaches because it's a cloud platform and it's a bit costly as compared to other services
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    We are the judgement that Wolfram Mathematica is despite many critics based on the paradigms selected a mark in the fields of the markets for computations of all kind. Wolfram Mathematica is even a choice in fields where other bolide systems reign most of the market. Wolfram Mathematica offers rich flexibility and internally standardizes the right methodologies for his user community. Wolfram Mathematica is not cheap and in need of a hard an long learner journey. That makes it weak in comparison with of-the-shelf-solution packages or even other programming languages. But for systematization of methods Wolfram Mathematica is far in front of almost all the other. Scientist and interested people are able to develop themself further and Wolfram Matheamatica users are a human variant for themself. The reach out for modern mathematics based science is deep and a unique unified framework makes the whole field of mathematics accessable comparable to the brain of Albert Einstein. The paradigms incorporated are the most efficients and consist in assembly on the market. The mathematics is covering and fullfills not just education requirements but the demands and needs of experts.
    Mathematica is incompatible with other systems for mCAx and therefore the borders between the systems are hard to overcome. Wolfram Mathematica should be consider one of the more open systems because other code can be imported and run but on the export side it is rathe incompatible by design purposes. A better standard for all that might solve the crisis but there is none in sight. Selection of knowledge of what works will be in the future even more focussed and general system might be one the lossy side. Knowledge of esthetics of what will be in the highest demand in necessary and Wolfram is not a leader in this field of science. Mathematics leves from gathering problems from application fields and less from the glory of itself and the formalization of this.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • Easily to set up for data sources, already supports quite a few of AWS and non-AWS data sources
    • Cost friendly since users are charged only for basis of usage
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    • It allows straightforward integration of analytic analysis of algebraic expressions and their numerical implemented.
    • Supports varying programmatic paradigms, so one can choose what best fits the problem or task: pure functions, procedural programming, list processing, and even (with a bit of setup) object-oriented programming.
    • The extensive and rich tools for graphical rendering make it very easy to not just get 2D and 3D renderings of final output, but also to do quick-and-dirty 2D and 3D rendering of intermediate results and/or debugging results.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • It is still immature as a cloud-based BI tool.
    • Its functionality is about 40-50% of its competitor's products.
    • Application is still a little buggy and non-intuitive at times.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    • Should include more libraries and functions.
    • Should include more functions that can be used in Machine Learning.
    • Should include more functions that can be used in Data Science.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    It was helping us a lot as per our business needs. Reporting is way easy with QuickSight that helps us to understand the performance of campaigns effectively and so does the performance of sales individual. We can analyze the data and create a new strategies effectively. Setup and maintenance was way easy
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    They provide proper support when needed. They are always ready to provide the box solution and make things easier for users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    Wolfram Mathematica is a nice software package. It has very nice features and easy to install and use in your machine. Besides this, there is a nice support from Wolfram. They come to the university frequently to give seminars in Mathematica. I think this is the best thing they are doing. That is very helpful for graduate and undergraduate students who are using Mathematica in their research.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    All of the other reporting platforms my organization has used previously were within our CRM and not a standalone program. In that we were very limited in being able to slice and dice the data the way that we wanted to
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    We have evaluated and are using in some cases the Python language in concert with the Jupyter notebook interface. For UI, we using libraries like React to create visually stunning visualizations of such models. Mathematica compares favorably to this alternative in terms of speed of development. Mathematica compares unfavorably to this alternative in terms of license costs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • Cost Effective
    • Easy setup and maintenance
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    • Easy to solve huge mathematical equations, so it saved time there
    • Doing analysis and plotting graphs is also another plus point
    • Learning is very slow, and it took lot of time to learn its scripting language
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots