What users are saying about
Amazon RDS vs Scylla
Top Rated
107 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>Score 9 out of 100
Based on 107 reviews and ratings
5 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>Score 9.2 out of 100
Based on 5 reviews and ratings
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon RDS
If you're operating within the Amazon universe of cloud computing, it's almost a no-brainer to utilize [Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)]. RDS is well suited for probably a majority of applications that are candidates to host on a cloud computing platform as it reduces overall management and complexity of your system.However, if you're doing a lot of data exporting/importing using tools that write to/read from the disk on the server, you may have challenges integrating RDS, as you have no access to the underlying host.

Verified User
Engineer in Engineering
Marketing and Advertising Company, 11-50 employeesScylla
Scylla is well suited for high-throughput scenarios where keyed data must be read or written with consistently low latency. It's less appropriate for use cases requiring relational queries, secondary indexes, or more structured data sets.
CTO, Co-founder
PersosaComputer Software, 1-10 employees
Feature Rating Comparison
Database-as-a-Service
Amazon RDS
9.4
Scylla
—
Automatic software patching
Amazon RDS
9.7
Scylla
—
Database scalability
Amazon RDS
9.7
Scylla
—
Automated backups
Amazon RDS
9.2
Scylla
—
Database security provisions
Amazon RDS
9.5
Scylla
—
Monitoring and metrics
Amazon RDS
8.3
Scylla
—
Automatic host deployment
Amazon RDS
9.7
Scylla
—
NoSQL Databases
Amazon RDS
—
Scylla
8.4
Performance
Amazon RDS
—
Scylla
9.1
Availability
Amazon RDS
—
Scylla
9.1
Concurrency
Amazon RDS
—
Scylla
9.1
Data model flexibility
Amazon RDS
—
Scylla
6.4
Pros
Amazon RDS
- For engineers with experience managing databases, setup is simple. And for the uninitiated, the RDS console interface becomes intuitive with some practice.
- Not having the maintain the underlying infrastructure is a great benefit of using RDS. Patching and backups can be scheduled from the console and from then on are pretty much automated.
- Right-sizing the DB instance to perform optimally with an application can be a very simple procedure. If a DB instance is not struggling to keep up, the instance size can be scaled up with just a few clicks.
- Baseline configurations are generally sane for most RDS instances. This allows novice developers and engineers to get the most out of the service without being a complete database administrator.
Senior Systems Reliability Engineer
The Walt Disney CompanyEntertainment, 10,001+ employees
Scylla
- Low-latency reads
- CQL has a familiar syntax
- Parity with Cassandra
- Practical features
CTO, Co-founder
PersosaComputer Software, 1-10 employees
Cons
Amazon RDS
- There should be a proper listing of all parameter groups alongside the instances that they are attached to. This would help to see which instances would be affected if a parameter group is changed.
- RDS should allow SUPER privilege to the master user. A few advanced tasks(like getting a physical backup using MySQL Enterprise Backup) fail because SUPER privilege is not available for the master user.
- A few parameters are not modifiable in the parameter groups and the access to the server filesystem is not given. This should not be the case because as an advanced user, you might want to understand things a little deeper.
Software Developer
ezDIHealth, Wellness and Fitness, 201-500 employees
Scylla
- Better documentation for best practices (e.g., how to effectively use connection pooling)
CTO, Co-founder
PersosaComputer Software, 1-10 employees
Usability
Amazon RDS
Amazon RDS 8.7
Based on 5 answers
The vast majority of things you'd want to do in Amazon Relational Database Service are simple to accomplish and remarkably consistent across database engines. Pricing, scalability and monitoring are easy to configure. If I had one complaint, it's that database engine specific features are not well documented in AWS, requiring reading external documentation in order to use some database systems to the fullest. But for most use cases, the defaults available in AWS are simple, easy to use, and good enough.

Verified User
Professional in Information Technology
Human Resources Company, 51-200 employeesScylla
Scylla 8.2
Based on 1 answer
Very easy-to-understand syntax--uses CQL (same as Cassandra), which has many similarities to standard SQL. There are some gotchas, however, that must be known during schema development.
CTO, Co-founder
PersosaComputer Software, 1-10 employees
Support Rating
Amazon RDS
Amazon RDS 8.9
Based on 25 answers
The product is fairly straight forward to use, and staff as well as knowledge base is pretty good for getting answers you may need. The product is a great, flexible alternative to adding to one's own in-house infrastructure. It's especially useful for environments that you aren't sure about the overall long term need. Amazon Relational Database Service is great for environments that once you determine the long term need, can be maintained by Amazon.
President, Principal
Klaxon IT SolutionsHospital & Health Care, 11-50 employees
Scylla
Scylla 9.1
Based on 1 answer
The Scylla cloud support team is incredibly responsive and proactive.
CTO, Co-founder
PersosaComputer Software, 1-10 employees
Alternatives Considered
Amazon RDS
Amazon Relational Database Service will probably give you everything you need from a traditional manual DB setup, except everything is managed for you. The only downside is having to pay the premium for the service; however, the trade-off of not having to deal with the intricacies involved with database administration, make it well worth it for most.
Senior Software Engineer
RocketripComputer Software, 11-50 employees
Scylla
CTO, Co-founder
PersosaComputer Software, 1-10 employees
Return on Investment
Amazon RDS
- Switching back to RDS from Redshift has made my BI Dashboards much more performant (though again, we're not dealing with data in the magnitudes that justify the Redshift toolset).
- It has decreased our tech debt. Engineering has been much more straight forward.
- Our uptime has been improved by removing unnecessary data migration processes.
Senior Project Manager
OnMetricInternet, 11-50 employees
Scylla
- Addresses latency requirements of our platform
CTO, Co-founder
PersosaComputer Software, 1-10 employees
Screenshots
Amazon RDS
Scylla
—Pricing Details
Amazon RDS
General
Free Trial
—Free/Freemium Version
—Premium Consulting/Integration Services
—Entry-level set up fee?
Optional
Free to try. Pay only for what you use with no minimum fee.
Amazon RDS Editions & Modules
Edition
Amazon RDS for MySQL | $0.29 ($0.58)1 |
---|---|
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL | $0.24 ($0.48)1 |
Amazon RDS for MariaDB | $0.25 ($0.50)1 |
Amazon RDS for Oracle | $0.482 ($0.964)1 |
Amazon RDS for SQL Server | $1.02 ($1.52)1 |
- per hour, R5 Large (R5 Extra Large)
Additional Pricing Details
—Scylla
General
Free Trial
—Free/Freemium Version
—Premium Consulting/Integration Services
—Entry-level set up fee?
No
Scylla Editions & Modules
—