281 Reviews and Ratings
2 Reviews and Ratings
Amazon Relational Database Service is a perfect fit for everyone who is seeking for an high-performance cloud-based database service. No matter if Postgres, Oracle, or any other type of relational database. Amazon RDS is our first choice for any kind of database requirement in the cloud. Especially I like the scalability.
If you have to manage a lot of different databases from different vendors, you could do well by standardizing on this product. It checks all the boxes for a proper database management studio. You would only have to learn one product to manage them all. However, if you are looking to find a good product for a single database vendor, you might be better off finding a tool that was designed specifically for that vendor product.Incentivized
Automated Database Management: We use it for streamlining routine tasks like software patching and database backups.Scalability on Demand: we use it to handle traffic spikes, scaling both vertically and horizontally.Database Engine Compatibility: It works amazingly with multiple database engines used by different departments within our organization including MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, and Oracle.Monitoring: It covers our extensive monitoring and logging, and also has great compatibility with Amazon CloudWatchIncentivized
Foreign Key Constraint data viewer! This was a tremendously helpful feature that not many other products have. Just pick a constraint and see the data in the child tables! No setup required!Supports any and every database imaginable.Incentivized
It is a little difficult to configure and connect to an RDS instance. The integration with ECS can be made more seamless.Exploring features within RDS is not very easy and intuitive. Either a human friendly documentation should be added or the User Interface be made intuitive so that people can explore and find features on their own.There should be tools to analyze cost and minimize it according to the usage.Incentivized
Somewhat laggy performance. Boot up speed was on the slow side and connecting to our database servers was also a little slower than other products.User interface can be a little clunky. Instead of the usual tree view of servers, databases, and schemas, you are presented with lists that you click on and get new windows to pick the new list of data from. Not organized efficiently.Incentivized
We do renew our use of Amazon Relational Database Service. We don't have any problems faced with RDS in place. RDS has taken away lot of overhead of hosting database, managing the database and keeping a team just to manage database. Even the backup, security and recovery another overhead that has been taken away by RDS. So, we will keep on using RDS.Incentivized
I've been using AWS Relational Database Services in several projects in different environments and from the AWS products, maybe this one together to EC2 are my favourite. They deliver what they promise. Reliable, fast, easy and with a fair price (in comparison to commercial products which have obscure license agreements).Incentivized
I have only had good experiences in working with AWS support. I will admit that my experience comes from the benefit of having a premium tier of support but even working with free-tier accounts I have not had problems getting help with AWS products when needed. And most often, the docs do a pretty good job of explaining how to operate a service so a quick spin through the docs has been useful in solving problems.Incentivized
the online training & digital content available on the web from AWS was having sufficient information to deploy and run the serviceIncentivized
In a few words, we are just to confortable working with oracle and sql server. Using RDS add another layer of distributed database in order to backup everything we have in case of a disaster and also complies with authorities locally and internacionally. All database we use, are local in custom servers that we maintain, but we agree to expand this.Incentivized
Compared to Microsoft's SQL Management Studio, Valentina studio was comparable, just harder to get used to in the UI department. It ran slightly slower than other products but did save some time with neat features they baked into the product. However, in using DBeaver Community and DBForge Studio for PostgreSQL from Devart, we found different products that the team ultimately decided to use. DBeaver has all of the features we needed most (minus the constraint data viewer) and a more intuitive UI that we were used to. DBForge Studio for PostgreSQL has a very standard Windows look and feel and lacks some features, like database/table designers, but makes up for those shortcomings in the much easier filtering and sorting options right in the data grids. You can even write a query and edit the data returned, which is something we don't see in many of these tools. Our team ultimately settled on the developers using DBeaver and the support team that needs data viewing/editing capabilities using DBForge Studio. Incentivized
RDS is costly and thus small business should avoid it as it might not be worthful (in ROI perspective)Downtime is very low and there are automated backups thus we dont have to worry much about technical stuff and can focus more on marketing and salesDue to various automated features such as automated backup etc we dont need a huge technical team thus reducing the cost of maintaining a huge technical team ,Incentivized
It saved time in some areas of finding child data by not having to write queries to find it.The user interface caused some extra training for some users and ultimately caused them to not like using it.Incentivized