Ansys SpaceClaim vs. National Instruments LabVIEW

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Ansys SpaceClaim
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Ansys SpaceClaim is presented as a modeling solution for engineers who want access to 3D answers but don't have the time or inclination to learn complex traditional CAD systems. It provides tools to accelerate geometry preparation and get to simulation sooner while eliminating delays between design teams. SpaceClaim's tools help free designers and analysis to focus on simulation results by accelerating the geometry creation process. Edit, repair and create any geometry…N/A
LabVIEW
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
National Instruments headquartered in Austin offers LabVIEW, a systems engineering software platform and toolkit.
$407
per year
Pricing
Ansys SpaceClaimNational Instruments LabVIEW
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
LabView Base
$407
per year
LabView Full
3,206
per year
LabView Professional
5,344
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ansys SpaceClaimLabVIEW
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Ansys SpaceClaimNational Instruments LabVIEW
Considered Both Products
Ansys SpaceClaim
Chose Ansys SpaceClaim
For the FEA analysis, PTC Creo, which is a CAD modelling software has inbuilt FEA simulation tool called as Creo Simulate which we generally use a very quick FEA on smaller parts. But when the geometry is very complex and we need to simplify it before the simulation, then we …
LabVIEW
Chose LabVIEW
National Instruments LabVIEW brings together some features of each of the mentioned software, however, it has a long way to go to fully integrate them. It is important to emphasize that through the integration presented by National Instruments LabVIEW, simple and complex tasks …
Chose LabVIEW
I don't know of any other graphical programming languages that our organization has tried to use or does use. Speaking for myself, I am not familiar with any other graphical programming languages. Comparing to text based programming languages, I feel like it is easier to …
Chose LabVIEW
We have used MatLab's data acquisition toolbox in the past which was not too bad either, especially if you prefer the text-based programming format. The only problem with that was that the library of compatible data acquisition hardware was somewhat limited and if your hardware …
Chose LabVIEW
We chose LabVIEW over Matlab due to the integration with hardware and the graphical programming interface. Also, the ability to use LabVIEW with FPGAs and real-time processors without having to make large changes to the code base or swapping to a separate programming …
Features
Ansys SpaceClaimNational Instruments LabVIEW
Computer-Aided Design Software
Comparison of Computer-Aided Design Software features of Product A and Product B
Ansys SpaceClaim
-
Ratings
National Instruments LabVIEW
8.0
Ratings
8% above category average
Rendering and Visualization00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Parametric Design00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Collaboration and Sharing00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Compatibility with other software and formats00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Assembly Design00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Simulation and Analysis00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Documentation and Annotation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Customization and Extensions00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Ansys SpaceClaimNational Instruments LabVIEW
Small Businesses
Autodesk Inventor
Autodesk Inventor
Score 8.2 out of 10
Onshape
Onshape
Score 6.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Autodesk Inventor
Autodesk Inventor
Score 8.2 out of 10
Onshape
Onshape
Score 6.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Navisworks
Navisworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
Rhino
Rhino
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Ansys SpaceClaimNational Instruments LabVIEW
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Ansys SpaceClaimNational Instruments LabVIEW
Likelihood to Recommend
I will highly recommend Ansys SpaceClaim, or in fact any Ansys to my colleague because of its wide spread acceptability around the globe and around the different industries. Thus, the results provided by Ansys simulation tools, given the proper boundary conditions are properly simulated, are highly reliable. Also, learning to utilize Ansys tools in the engineering design activities also helps in career advancements.
Read full review
Most of the time, I am using LabVIEW to develop automated controls for lab-scale and pilot-scale systems. LabVIEW is great for its graphical programming interface, which is easy to learn and understand. The program also has a lot of built-in VIs to perform different complicated I/O, data processing, controls, and graphing tasks which are extremely useful and convenient to use. My only problem with LabVIEW is how hard it is to clean up and debug the program, due to its being a graphical interface. It is hard to search for specific variables when debugging, and some of the online debugging features don't function well in real-time.
Read full review
Pros
  • It efficiently divide/split the surface into multiple fragments as per the user's requirements which helps in easy application of loads and boundary conditions.
  • It helps in reducing the model complexity with it's efficient defeaturing options in order to reduce the model complexity.
  • It also helps in making quick model changes as per the simulation results in order to improve the design and thus helps in quick FEA of the improvised design.
Read full review
  • real-time data visualization
  • implementation of modern control strategies
  • integration of languages such as python and c++, for various applications
  • data acquisition through microcontroller cards
Read full review
Cons
  • With time, Ansys SpaceClaim has evolved so much in its functionality and Ansys has added so many useful and complex features into it, but most of the team member are not aware about those features.
  • For the newly added features and improvement in legacy features, Ansys can try adding training videos to better aware the engineers about their evolving features.
  • Apart from that, I don't find anything disadvantageous about SpaceClaim.
Read full review
  • Barrier to entry is large
  • Install times are crazy
  • Just in time help needs to be more apparent (most students do not know about the examples section)
Read full review
Usability
As a Mechanical Design Engineer working in and designing heavy structures for battery packs and chargers, I use Ansys SpaceClaim, day in and day out regularly as whenever the design team forwards the CAD model to FEA team, FEA team optimizes the model in SpaceClaim only, and to do so, design team also helps them in Ansys SpaceClaim
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
For the FEA analysis, PTC Creo, which is a CAD modelling software has inbuilt FEA simulation tool called as Creo Simulate which we generally use a very quick FEA on smaller parts. But when the geometry is very complex and we need to simplify it before the simulation, then we use Ansys SpaceClaim to simplify the model and then use Ansys Mechanical for structural simulation.
Read full review
We have used MatLab's data acquisition toolbox in the past which was not too bad either, especially if you prefer the text-based programming format. The only problem with that was that the library of compatible data acquisition hardware was somewhat limited and if your hardware is not from one of the more popular brands like NI there is a good possibility that you won't be able to use it with your MatLab script. LAstly, the amount of supporting material (tutorials, etc.) is very limited as it is not a very popular tool
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Ansys SpaceClaim helps in easy modelling different types of design and different iterations of design which in turns helps in designing a cost effective products thereby saving a lot of material and production cost.
  • Because of the easiness in modelling, changing and modifying the design and then running the simulation over it, the design team is able to test and every concept, which I turn helps in producing an efficient and cost effective design.
Read full review
  • We are able to save money by writing our own programs instead of outsourcing.
  • We recently bought a new force test stand and we are able to use LabVIEW to write a program that fits our needs exactly instead of making due with what came with the stand.
  • When our customers ask us to do data acquisition, we know that we can always make a solution.
Read full review
ScreenShots