Apache Airflow vs. Camunda

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Airflow
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Apache Airflow is an open source tool that can be used to programmatically author, schedule and monitor data pipelines using Python and SQL.N/A
Camunda
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Camunda is a process orchestration tool designed to help organizations design, automate, and improve any process. Built for business and IT collaboration using BPMN and DMN standards, Camunda aims to enable seamless integration across endpoints to transform mission-critical processes.N/A
Pricing
Apache AirflowCamunda
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Self-Managed Enterprise
Contact Sales
per year
SaaS Enterprise
Contact Sales
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache AirflowCamunda
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache AirflowCamunda
Considered Both Products
Apache Airflow
Chose Apache Airflow
Step functions are only available in AWS but Apache Airflow provides cross cloud access. Apache Airflow also provides flexibility to pause, start and re-trigger dags. Provides executors where we can run in-house calculations if needed and which requires no integration with …
Chose Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow is suited for a much wider set of use cases compared to Databricks. You can run it anywhere, and there is also no vendor lock-in. With Airflow, we can utilize almost any compute engine. Same thing we want to do with Databricks. There might be some level of …
Chose Apache Airflow
Multiple DAGs can be orchestrated simultaneously at varying times, and runs can be reproduced or replicated with relative ease. Overall, utilizing Apache Airflow is easier to use than other solutions now on the market. It is simple to integrate in Apache Airflow, and the …
Chose Apache Airflow
Using Jenkins and Kafka, it is not for the same purpose, although it might be similar. I would say AirFlow is really what it says on the can - workflow management. For our organisation, the purpose is clear. So long your aim is to have a rich workflow scheduler and job …
Chose Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow is far superior!
Chose Apache Airflow
Much easy to deploy Apache Airflow as opposed to other products, with flexible deployment options as well as flexible integration with other tools and platforms.
Chose Apache Airflow
There are a number of reasons to choose Apache Airflow over other similar platforms- Integrations—ready-to-use operators allow you to integrate Airflow with cloud platforms (Google, AWS, Azure, etc) Apache Airflow helps with backups and other DevOps tasks, such as submitting a …
Chose Apache Airflow
digdag (https://www.digdag.io/)- Digdag is a very simple build, run, schedule, and monitor complex pipelines of tasks with a simple implementation and no configuration. Easy to write YAMLs

Airflow has a better community and widely adopted. Has a better UI and better documentation
Chose Apache Airflow
Overall using Apache Airflow is easy to use compare than other other tools available in the market, It is easy to integrate in apache airflow and the workflow can be monitored and scheduling can be done easily using apache airflow, recommend this tool for Automating the data …
Chose Apache Airflow
Airflow was best suited in my use case for designing the ETL pipelines in a scripted manner for workflows & the UI was very good & easy to use.
Camunda
Chose Camunda
They're just different products with different target audiences. In different ways, IBM and Pega have offerings that are meant to serve processes in a platform-centric approach to their customers. An emphasis on unified development environments, including forms building, …
Chose Camunda
Lacks good documentation. Training and documentation is geared towards those who are already technically adept. Does not have as many data integrations as other full fledged products. Paid version of Camunda is not as fully fledged as other products.
Features
Apache AirflowCamunda
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
Apache Airflow
8.6
Ratings
4% above category average
Camunda
-
Ratings
Multi-platform scheduling9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Central monitoring8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Logging8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Application integration9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Apache Airflow
-
Ratings
Camunda
9.0
Ratings
21% above category average
API for custom integration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Apache Airflow
-
Ratings
Camunda
8.0
Ratings
2% above category average
Dashboards00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Apache Airflow
-
Ratings
Camunda
8.5
Ratings
15% above category average
Process designer00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Process simulation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Business rules engine00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
SOA support00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Process player00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Form builder00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Model execution00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Business Process Automation
Comparison of Business Process Automation features of Product A and Product B
Apache Airflow
-
Ratings
Camunda
9.0
Ratings
27% above category average
Business Process Modeling00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Decision Modeling00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache AirflowCamunda
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Score 7.5 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.7 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache AirflowCamunda
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache AirflowCamunda
Likelihood to Recommend
For a quick job scanning of status and deep-diving into job issues, details, and flows, AirFlow does a good job. No fuss, no muss. The low learning curve as the UI is very straightforward, and navigating it will be familiar after spending some time using it. Our requirements are pretty simple. Job scheduler, workflows, and monitoring. The jobs we run are >100, but still is a lot to review and troubleshoot when jobs don't run. So when managing large jobs, AirFlow dated UI can be a bit of a drawback.
Read full review
Camunda Platform is well suited for scenarios where there are different stages in a business flow and the flow is driven by user action at each stage. For example placing of an order on an ecommerce platform. Depending on whether user was able to make the payment or not the workflow would go to dispatch or retry stage. Now the retry stage would trigger further actions like sending follow up emails etc. Likewise, dispatch stage would have a different set of actions. Since every order is important and we need to know where it stands, using Camunda Platform is imperative. Camunda Platform might not be a right choice where just a one off thing needs to be done. For example, uploading of product information by user or periodic processing of heavy images by a worker. These are all either one step processes or periodic automated processes where we can track the status without using a business modeler like Camunda Platform.
Read full review
Pros
  • Apache Airflow is one of the best Orchestration platforms and a go-to scheduler for teams building a data platform or pipelines.
  • Apache Airflow supports multiple operators, such as the Databricks, Spark, and Python operators. All of these provide us with functionality to implement any business logic.
  • Apache Airflow is highly scalable, and we can run a large number of DAGs with ease. It provided HA and replication for workers. Maintaining airflow deployments is very easy, even for smaller teams, and we also get lots of metrics for observability.
Read full review
  • Task orchestration
  • Freeware
  • Graphical interface allows normal users to understand business process model diagrams more intuitively
Read full review
Cons
  • A local "dry run" or IDE plugin that can validate and simulate DAG execution without needing a full environment.
  • Better feedback on DAG parse errors in the UI or CLI.
  • Navigating large DAGs with hundreds of tasks can be slow and hard to understand visually.
Read full review
  • Documentation - It is usually daunting for beginners because of lack of good documentation
  • Simplified setup on local machine for Camunda Server would help developers test changes quickly
  • Easier migration from one deployment version of a Camunda process to another deployment version would help in making changes and deploying them faster.
  • Heap memory management becomes issue at times resulting in stuck processes. This needs to be resolved.
Read full review
Usability
For its capability to connect with multicloud environments. Access Control management is something that we don't get in all the schedulers and orchestrators. But although it provides so many flexibility and options to due to python , some level of knowledge of python is needed to be able to build workflows.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Camunda provides pretty standard product support offerings.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache Airflow is suited for a much wider set of use cases compared to Databricks. You can run it anywhere, and there is also no vendor lock-in. With Airflow, we can utilize almost any compute engine. Same thing we want to do with Databricks. There might be some level of difficulty based on the support.
Read full review
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Most of the ETL processes were automated, cutting down on human labor.
  • Apache Airflow's user interface (UI) was very informative and straightforward.
  • Since ETL processes were providing data via airflow, we were able to gain a deeper comprehension of the data at hand.
Read full review
  • We've built a good business around developing and deploying Camunda for our clients over the last 7 years.
  • Our clients are finding it a cost-effective way to try before they buy.
  • There's an over-reliance on big offshore outsourcing shops, which hurts ROI and success rates.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Camunda Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of