What users are saying about
32 Ratings
32 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.6 out of 100
55 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.6 out of 100

Feature Set Ratings

    Application Servers

    Apache Camel

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    8.6

    Red Hat JBoss EAP

    86%
    Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform ranks higher in 6/6 features

    IDE support

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.1
    81%
    8 Ratings

    Security management

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.6
    86%
    8 Ratings

    Administration and management

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.1
    81%
    8 Ratings

    Application server performance

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.6
    86%
    8 Ratings

    Installation

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    9.4
    94%
    8 Ratings

    Open-source standards compliance

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.6
    86%
    8 Ratings

    Attribute Ratings

    • Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

    Likelihood to Recommend

    8.0

    Apache Camel

    80%
    9 Ratings
    8.1

    Red Hat JBoss EAP

    81%
    8 Ratings

    Likelihood to Renew

    Apache Camel

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    5.0

    Red Hat JBoss EAP

    50%
    1 Rating

    Usability

    Apache Camel

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.5

    Red Hat JBoss EAP

    85%
    3 Ratings

    Performance

    Apache Camel

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.7

    Red Hat JBoss EAP

    87%
    6 Ratings

    Support Rating

    Apache Camel

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    5.2

    Red Hat JBoss EAP

    52%
    4 Ratings

    Likelihood to Recommend

    Apache Camel

    Message brokering across different systems, with transactionality and the ability to have fine tuned control over what happens using Java (or other languages), instead of a heavy, proprietary languages.One situation that it doesn't fit very well (as far as I have experienced) is when your workflow requires significant data mapping. While possible when using Java tooling, some other visual data mapping tools in other integration frameworks are easier to work with.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Red Hat JBoss EAP

    JBoss EAP is subscription based/open source platform. It's very reliable and great for deploying high transaction Java based enterprise applications. It integrates well with third party components like mod_cluster and supports popular Java EE web-based frameworks such as Spring, Angular JS, jQuery Mobile, and Google Web Toolkit.
    Amanda Decker | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Pros

    Apache Camel

    • Camel has an easy learning curve. It is fairly well documented and there are about 5-6 books on Camel.
    • There is a large user group and blogs devoted to all things Camel and the developers of Camel provide quick answers and have also been very quick to patch Camel, when bugs are reported.
    • Camel integrates well with well known frameworks like Spring, and other middleware products like Apache Karaf and Servicemix.
    • There are over 150 components for the Camel framework that help integrate with diverse software platforms.
    • Camel is also good for creating microservices.
    Surjit Sen | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Red Hat JBoss EAP

    • MOD_CLUSTER integration. JBoss EAP integrates pretty well with mod_cluster. This is an intelligent load balancer especially useful in highly clustered environments.
    • Supports enterprise-grade features such as high availability clustering, distributed caching, messaging etc.
    • Supports deployment in on-premise, virtual and hybrid cloud environments.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Cons

    Apache Camel

    • Open source solution relies on community for support
    • Lacks graphical user interface for message routing and transformation definitions
    • Relatively steep learning curve
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Red Hat JBoss EAP

    • Jboss CLI is a great tool but we had trouble using it to get values that are displayed on Jboss GUI. It also has limitations parsing the applications.xml files and we had to use a mix of jboss-cli and linux bash commands to automate certain application administrative tasks.
    • JBoss doesn't really provides performance tuning recommendations. It would have been nice if it could learn from the current demand vs current settings for things like connection pool, server configurations, garbage collection etc.
    Amanda Decker | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Pricing Details

    Apache Camel

    General

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Entry-level set up fee?
    No

    Starting Price

    Red Hat JBoss EAP

    General

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Entry-level set up fee?
    No

    Starting Price

    Likelihood to Renew

    Apache Camel

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Red Hat JBoss EAP

    Red Hat JBoss EAP 5.0
    Based on 1 answer
    We are planning to migrate away from Jboss to Tomcat as Jboss has shown not interest in supporting OSGi which is heavily used at our shop
    sameer vaidya | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Usability

    Apache Camel

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Red Hat JBoss EAP

    Red Hat JBoss EAP 8.5
    Based on 3 answers
    JBoss overall is easy to use. The installation and deployment of applications are quick. Documentations and support are also readily available.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Performance

    Apache Camel

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Red Hat JBoss EAP

    Red Hat JBoss EAP 8.7
    Based on 6 answers
    Usually, Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is good at performance and well suited for high traffic Java EE-based applications, but we have faced hard times performance tuning it for our specific needs. The product would be nicer if they would add a performance diagnostic and recommendations feature to it.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Support Rating

    Apache Camel

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Red Hat JBoss EAP

    Red Hat JBoss EAP 5.2
    Based on 4 answers
    Fast response.
    Holman Cárdenas, M.Eng, TOGAF®, ITIL® | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Alternatives Considered

    Apache Camel

    We chose Apache Camel because it was lightweight, easy to get started with and because it had a groovy DSL since we were a grails shop when we started using it.
    Akmal Muqeeth | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Red Hat JBoss EAP

    We selected JBoss because of compatibility with EJB's. We currently are trying to reduce our footprint and will highly consider using Tomcat.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Return on Investment

    Apache Camel

    • huge cost saving and quick turn around in terms of extracting data from files and integrating them to our processes
    • ease the work with java objects
    • modernizing our API services
    • ease of using it with Apache's TomCat server
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Red Hat JBoss EAP

    • Jboss EAP is easy to deploy and configure. This lead to lower cost and faster delivery.
    • Even though we have large number of machines running JBoss, we have only two Jboss Administrators. It doesn't requires too much administration and maintenance on daily basis and reduces number of administrators required for large implementations.
    Amanda Decker | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Add comparison