6 Reviews and Ratings
9 Reviews and Ratings
if you're doing joins from hBASE, hdfs, cassandra and redis, then this works. Using it as a be all end all does not suit it. This is not your straight forward magic software that works for all scenarios. One needs to determine the use case to see if Apache Drill fits the needs. 3/4 of the time, usually it does.Incentivized
Oracle NoSQL Database is well-suited for you if your data formats are not consistent, if you have limited hardware resources, if you higher data throughput (whether the database is on the cloud or running locally), and if you don't need a declarative query language to maintain a standardized schema of your data. If you need reduced data redundancy and require ACID compliance, you are better off finding an SQL database solution.
queries multiple data sources with ease.supports sql, so non technical users who know sql, can run query sets3rd party tools, like tableau, zoom data and looker were able to connect with no issuesIncentivized
Data-model flexibility. Unlike RDBMS solutions, Oracle NoSQL does not restrict you to a predefined set of data types.Ability to Handle an Increased Amount of Traffic. As Oracle NoSQL can process queries much quicker than Oracle Database, Oracle NoSQL is able to respond to a lot more queries in the same amount of time.Data-model simplicity. In SQL-oriented databases, there is a learning curve in learning the relationship between databases, tables, rows, and keys. On the other hand, Oracle NoSQL's key-value based storage is much easier to get the hang of.
deployment. Not as easyconfiguration isn't as straight forward, especially with the documentationGarbage collection could be improved uponIncentivized
Fewer analytical functions to choose from. When compared to Oracle Database, there is significant difference in the amount of built-in analytical functions.Eventual data consistency. It is not guaranteed that a write or delete query will be immediately visible for subsequent queries.Data redundancy. As there are no mechanisms that insure data integrity, users are more likely to have redundant data across their documents.
if Presto comes up with more support (ie hbase, s3), then its strongly possible that we'll move from apache drill to prestoDB. However, Apache drill needs more configuration ease, especially when it comes to garbage collection tuning. If apache drill could support also sparkSQL and Flume, then it does change drill into being something more valuable than prestoDBIncentivized
compared to presto, has more support than prestodb. Impala has limitations to what drill can support apache phoenix only supports for hbase. no support for cassandra. Apache drill was chosen, because of the multiple data stores that it supports htat the other 3 do not support. Presto does not support hbase as of yet. Impala does not support query to cassandraIncentivized
I have not used any other types of NoSQL databases.
Configuration has taken some serious time out.Garbage collection tuning. is a constant hassle. time and effort applied to it, vs dedicating resources elsewhere.w/ sql support, reduces the need of devs to generate the resultset for analysts, when they can run queries themselves (if they know sql).Incentivized
We pay less for computing resources, as Oracle NoSQL databases respond quicker than our previous SQL databases.Our database administrators and software developers do not need to worry about "data massaging" and can focus on perfecting application logic.Oracle NoSQL has built-in integration to other Oracle products, so we didn't not need to spend money on building custom integrators or higher additional developers.