TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Apache Geode

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AApache Geode is a distributed in-memory database designed to support low latency, high concurrency solutions, available free and open source since 2002. With it, users can build high-speed, data-intensive applications that elastically meet performance requirements. Apache Geode blends techniques for data replication, partitioning and distributed processing.N/A

    RavenDB

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/ARavenDB is a NoSQL Document Database that is fully transactional (ACID) across the database and throughout clusters. The database minimizes the need for third party addons, tools, or support to boost developer productivity and get projects into production fast. Users can setup and secure a data cluster deploy in the cloud, on-premise or in a hybrid environment. RavenDB offers a Database as a Service solution, allowing users to pass on all…N/A
    Pricing
    Apache GeodeRavenDB
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Apache GeodeRavenDB
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Apache GeodeRavenDB
    Considered Both Products
    Apache
    No answer on this topic
    RavenDB
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Would buy again
    18 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    18 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    19 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    14 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    16 Answers
    Features
    Apache GeodeRavenDB
    NoSQL Databases
    Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Apache Geode and RavenDB
    Feature
    Apache Geode
    8.7
    1 Ratings
    2% above category average
    RavenDB
    9.1
    24 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Performance9.01 Ratings9.024 Ratings
    Availability10.01 Ratings8.923 Ratings
    Concurrency10.01 Ratings8.023 Ratings
    Scalability8.01 Ratings9.623 Ratings
    Data model flexibility7.01 Ratings9.924 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility8.01 Ratings9.423 Ratings
    Security00 Ratings9.223 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Apache GeodeRavenDB
    Small Businesses
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Apache GeodeRavenDB
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.1
    (24 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.5
    (5 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (20 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.1
    (21 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Apache GeodeRavenDB
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apache
    The biggest advantage of using Apache Geode is DB like consistency. So for applications whose data needs to be in-memory, accessible at low latencies and most importantly writes have to be consistent, should use Apache Geode. For our application quite some amount of data is static which we store in MySQL as it can be easily manipulated. But since this data is large R/w from DB becomes expensive. So we started using Redis. Redis does a brilliant job, but with complex data structures and no query like capability, we have to manage it via code. We are experimenting with Apache Geode and it looks promising as now we can query on complex data-structures and get the required data quickly and also updates consistent.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    RavenDB
    If you're a.NET developer searching for a system other than SQL Server for business assessment, then you must try RavenDB. RavenDB is a fantastic document-oriented system that has been specifically developed to work with all.NET or Windows systems. Developers are continually working on such systems to eliminate their flaws while also providing a few benefits. We must refresh ourselves on a regular basis since the free software system is like an open area where anybody may stand up with a brilliant solution to the issue. RavenDB is absolutely worth a look
    Read full review
    Pros
    Apache
    • Super Fast data pull/push
    • Provided ACID transactions, so it works like a SQL Database
    • Provides replication & partitioning, so our data is never lost and extraction is super fast. NoSql like properties
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    RavenDB
    • Document Database - no Object-Relational Impedance Mismatch
    • ACID support that is optimized for performance
    • Can be easily integrated into automated tests (unit tests)
    • Easily configurable via C# code
    • Comes directly with RavenStudio - no SSMS or SQL Developer required
    • In general low footprint when it comes to memory and disk consumption
    • Useful safety nets for new developers - e.g. by default an exception is thrown when you make too many requests within a session
    Read full review
    Cons
    Apache
    • Needs more supporting languages. Out of box Python, Nodejs adapters would be wonderful
    • Currently it supports just KV Store. But if we could cache documents or timeseries data would be great
    • Needs more community support, documentation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    RavenDB
    • The documentation is very good, but it's sometimes hard to find the topic I'm looking for.
    • Updating references is done manually. It would be nice if there was a feature to help with that. I'm not sure that's even possible though.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    RavenDB
    We've had an excellent experience using RavenDB. Internally we are testing the newer features in 5.0 such as time series, which will effect the con specified previously dependent on the real world performance. We foresee that BattleCrate will continue to use RavenDB as we grow.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Apache
    Still Experimenting. Initial results are good. we need to figure out if we can completely replace Redis. Cost wise if it makes sense to keep both or replacement is feasible.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    RavenDB
    Really good .NET client that is very easy to use. The management studio is excellent and puts anything that Microsoft or Oracle have to shame. Very quick to develop with once the complexity hurdle has been overcome. Initially using it can be a bit painful until you fully grasp the event sourced nature of the indexing.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Apache
    Never contacted support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    RavenDB
    The support is really fast and flexible. Since one single working day, we got a response to our first request, only 4 days later we got a technical demonstration for our complete developer team to get in touch with raven and its performance. Also during our development, we got a quick response to questions.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    RavenDB
    RavenFS changed along the way and made us change the codes.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Apache
    Still Experimenting. But looks promising as it has query capabilities over complex data structures
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    RavenDB
    The given alternatives are also powerful and really good noSQL databases but the highest availability of RavenDB allows me/us to know it a lot better. RavenDB is encrypted by default wherever we use it in production and it has a high level of documents compression.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Apache
    • Still experimenting so difficult to quote
    • For a small size project/teams might be an overkill as it still has certain learning curve
    • For Medium to large projects with complex Data Structures that need to be queried with a fast o/p it definitely works
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    RavenDB
    • RavenDB has saved my customers a lot of money with their cloud services' tiered model. The database is able to grow with the project/company and can start out small at a low cost.
    • RavenDB is free for three nodes and three CPUs, which makes it great for development scenarios. You're able to start rapidly building applications without having to worry about licensing.
    • Scaling out has allowed us to use three small cloud servers when starting out and get the performance and throughput of a single larger server.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots