TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Apache Lucene vs. Inbenta Enterprise Search

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Apache Lucene

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AApache Lucene is an open source and free text search engine library written in Java. It is a technology suitable for applications that requires full-text search, and is available cross-platform.

    $0

    per month

    Inbenta Enterprise Search

    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Inbenta is a conversational intelligence technology provider headquartered in Sunnyvale. Inbenta Search is a search tool built with the vendor’s Symbolic AI and Natural Language Processing (NLP) that aims to help the user reduce support cost by understanding customers’ questions and quickly delivering the most relevant answers, providing a self-service solution to customer support.N/A
    Pricing
    Apache LuceneInbenta Enterprise Search
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Apache LuceneInbenta Enterprise Search
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
    Additional DetailsA free and open source product.Inbenta is a scalable solution. The vendor charges based on the number of sessions or searches that occur on the user's support site. The vendor also offers free trials with certain partner integrations including Zendesk and Salesforce Desk.com.
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Apache LuceneInbenta Enterprise Search
    Small Businesses
    Elasticsearch
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Elasticsearch
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Elasticsearch
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Elasticsearch
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Amazon CloudSearch
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Amazon CloudSearch
    Score8.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Apache LuceneInbenta Enterprise Search
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Apache LuceneInbenta Enterprise Search
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apache
    Apache Lucene is a perfect text search implementation where the heap space usage needs to be kept to its minimal. It also enables search based on various search fields and most importantly the search and index process can happen simultaneously. The only scenario where it might be less appropriate would be when the index size grows too big. We have witnessed few scalable issues where the search would take a while when the index size is too large.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Inbenta Technologies Inc.
    If you are looking for an enterprise search platform that offers an easy to use interface and if high performance is not really your priority, then I believe Inbenta Enterprise Search would fit your use case. For most other situations, I would recommend using a tried and tested search platform like Apache Solr.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Apache
    • We found Apache Lucene to be extremely performant in querying large amounts of data and retrieving the correct files based on the metadata provided.
    • The online community offers great support for the product. Even though it is an open source tool, it is not difficult to find help online for it.
    • When we were creating a proof of concept application, we found that the software worked just as well, while being run locally on a resource-limited PC.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Inbenta Technologies Inc.
    • Fairly easy to use interface.
    • Quick to onboard new users, both in terms of access as well as training.
    • The NLP-based semantic search feature is quite impressive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Apache
    • User interface for setup and maintenance would be helpful.
    • Easier cloud/cluster setup.
    • Better, centralized documentation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Inbenta Technologies Inc.
    • It is a fairly new tool in the market, so not much market feedback exists for this. This made us apprehensive in using it.
    • The documentation and online forums are bare minimum.
    • Quite buggy when working with multiple sources.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Apache
    The search and index performance of [Apache] Lucene is excellent and the quality of results is good, if not better. For implementing it with small scale applications it is a no brainer, Lucene is the best and most cost effective solution. Learning curve is not too steep either.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Inbenta Technologies Inc.
    Apache Solr to Inbenta is like Java to Python. Apache Solr is powerful and handles complex search platforms well. Inbenta, on the other hand, is meant to be easy to use and does not lay too much emphasis on performance. If you are a small or medium business, Inbenta may suit your needs better. However, if you wish to manage a large and complex search platform, Solr is the way to go.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Apache
    • Being an open source project we did not have to pay any licensing fees for using Apache Lucene. It has greatly improved our search functionality in our web apps.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Inbenta Technologies Inc.
    • Enabled our developers to quickly deploy changes to the search model.
    • NLP-powered semantic search feedback provides good actionable insights.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Apache Lucene Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshot

    Inbenta Enterprise Search Screenshots

    Screenshot of Inbenta Search Sample Result