appFiles vs. Kiteworks

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
appFiles
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Kiteworks
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Kiteworks empowers organizations to manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance. With on-premise, private cloud, hybrid and FedRAMP deployment…
$15
per user/month
Pricing
appFilesKiteworks
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Business
$15
per user/month
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
appFilesKiteworks
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
appFilesKiteworks
Considered Both Products
appFiles

No answer on this topic

Kiteworks
Chose Kiteworks
The main reason for selecting Kiteworks is that when sharing files with multiple customers, each customer has no idea who the other customers are. To do that in Teams would require users to create a private team for each customer, which would be very [time-consuming].
Best Alternatives
appFilesKiteworks
Small Businesses
SugarSync
SugarSync
Score 3.8 out of 10
SugarSync
SugarSync
Score 3.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 8.9 out of 10
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 8.9 out of 10
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
appFilesKiteworks
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
appFilesKiteworks
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
We are sending some pools securely via Kiteworks. Sharing and receiving secure files from 3rd party users and tracking files are very simple. Kiteworks solved compliance and security issues.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Microsoft Office Plugins
  • Desktop Synchronization
  • Mobile Ability
  • Group chat
  • File Filtering
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Encrypting our files appears to be less than 100% complete
  • Software updates cannot be scheduled to take place automatically like their old product
  • Detailed activity logging is not available to administrators. You must submit the logs to Accellion for analysis.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
The main reason for selecting Kiteworks is that when sharing files with multiple customers, each customer has no idea who the other customers are. To do that in Teams would require users to create a private team for each customer, which would be very [time-consuming].
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • We have tried to move to other products but our users will have nothing of that.
  • We migrated from the Accellion MFT product with relative ease.
  • We have less than 100 users, using over 1.5 TB of space, so it's a very popular product.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Kiteworks Screenshots

Screenshot of The CISO Dashboard: See All Sensitive Content Entering or Leaving the EnterpriseScreenshot of Send Secure Email with Ease from MS Outlook, Web or MobileScreenshot of Share Documents Securely from Word, Excel, PowerPoint and Outlook