Applitools vs. Playwright

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Applitools
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Applitools helps Test Automation, DevOps and Development teams release and monitor mobile, web, and native apps. It is a commercial-grade, visual cloud engine that validates the visual aspects of any Web, Mobile and Native app in an automated way. It supports Continuous Deployment in multi-device, multi-browser environments. Founded in 2015, Applitools states they have hundreds of customers from a range of verticals, including Fortune 100 companies in Banking, Software, Online Retail,…N/A
Playwright
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
A cross-browser testing tool, playwright supports all modern rendering engines including Chromium, WebKit, and Firefox. Users can test on Windows, Linux, and macOS, locally or on CI, headless or headed. It is also cross-language, so that the Playwright API can be used in TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, .NET, Java. Test Mobile Web. Native mobile emulation of Google Chrome for Android and Mobile Safari. The same rendering engine works on the Desktop and in the Cloud. Playright…
$0
Pricing
ApplitoolsPlaywright
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ApplitoolsPlaywright
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
ApplitoolsPlaywright
Automation Testing
Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
Applitools
7.6
1 Ratings
11% below category average
Playwright
-
Ratings
Record and Automate8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Browser Testing7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Testing8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Test Scheduling7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Test Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
CI/CD Tool Integration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrated Version Control7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Data-Driven Testing6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Testing Collaboration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Real Device Testing8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ApplitoolsPlaywright
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.5 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ApplitoolsPlaywright
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
ApplitoolsPlaywright
Likelihood to Recommend
Applitools
Scenarios where Applitools is well suited: Cross-browser and Cross-device Testing: Applitools shines in scenarios where applications need to be tested across multiple browsers (chrome,ie,firefox) UI Component Libraries: When working with UI component libraries or design systems, Applitools allows to capture and maintain a visual baseline for each component, Applitools may not work with highly animated sites and in non visual testing purpose
Read full review
Microsoft
Playwright is works pretty well for automating the critical user paths of any web application, ensuring that core functionalities are constantly tested and catching issues before they reach QA, particularly through its seamless integration into our CI/CD (in our case, using GithHub); however, it is less appropriate for mobile testing since it doesn't support mobile applications. Testers still needs to learn another framework to do this.
Read full review
Pros
Applitools
  • visual testing
  • cross browser testing
  • easy integration with testing frameworks
Read full review
Microsoft
  • API
  • UI
  • Performance
Read full review
Cons
Applitools
  • Test Maintenance- no built-in mechanism to automatically handle dynamic or volatile elements,
  • Test Configuration Flexibility- ability to specify different tolerances or thresholds for specific test elements or regions within a single test
  • Test Execution Performance- larger test suites or complex visual validations can sometimes lead to longer execution times.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • bigger adoption
  • mobile testing
Read full review
Usability
Applitools
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
It makes automating complex user interactions easier, fits right into our CI/CD for continuous testing, and works great across different browsers. The Documentation is a plus, you don't really need to search a lot to understand and find what you need for the coding. The community is small but very helpful, which makes it a breeze to use and a must-have for keeping our software in top shape.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Applitools
Applitools is better than browser stack & LambdaTest as it offers AI-Powered Testing: Applitools leverages AI and machine learning algorithms to enhance its visual testing capabilities. The AI algorithms help in automatically identifying and classifying visual differences. Applitools introduces the concept of "Smart Locators," which are dynamic identifiers used to locate and identify elements in a more efficient manner.
Read full review
Microsoft
We selected Playwright over the rest for several reasons. The learning curve is faster, making it easier for our team to get up to speed quickly. The setup is pretty straithtforwared, minimal configurartion needed and a great example included in the configuration which includes all the basics to start writing using that spec as a placeholder. Compared to Cypress, Playwright support multiple browsers out of the box, giving us broader testing coverage. Appium is great for mobile testing, but extremely slow.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Applitools
  • cost effective
  • faster delivery of product
  • less error prone testing
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Usable
  • customisable
  • extendable
Read full review
ScreenShots