Apryse PDF SDK vs. Hyland Content Composer

PDFTon is best suited for larger organizations in order to maximize the multiple features and functionality and to justify the cost. The users will need a programmer that can develop solutions to deploy using multiple programming languages. They need to be able to understand how the different types of code can interact. Small organizations would have a hard time justifying the cost and may not have the skill sets to deploy it easily.

Incentivized

Those companies and individuals who have to manage so many documents can use this product. This product will help the users to easily create, modify and share the documents with anyone, and the user interface is very simple and easy navigation available that can be easily understood by not technical staff also

Incentivized

• Great customer support
• New releases with added features
• Very configurable

Incentivized

• Mass communication and Customization.
• Creating customized content at large scale.
• Time saving.
• Allow to create rule based automated correspondence.

Incentivized

• Lowering the cost
• Remove evergreen clause from contract

Incentivized

• Complicated integration process.
• Higher response time.

Incentivized

PDFTron was our first choice because it was the best solution we could find at the time. it was the most versatile and easiest for us to deploy mostly because of the great support they provided. I had the opportunity to meet with them prior to purchasing and they seemed like a company that would continue growth of the product and listen to their customers for improvements.

Incentivized

• It has allows our organization to stay ahead of the competition.
• The demonstrations we perform for potential customer are very impressive
• Our customers appreciate the versatility of features

Incentivized

• Save money and time that was spent previously creating documents by hand.
• Increase engagement rate and revenue of my company.

Incentivized