Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
aqua cloud
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
aqua cloud is an AI-powered test management system designed specifically for regulated industries and big enterprises that aims to help to accelerate audit processes and speed up releases.N/A
TestRail
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
TestRail by Gurock, an IDERA company, is presented as a complete web-based test case management solution to manage, track, and organize your software testing efforts.
$35
per month billed annually
Tuskr
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Tuskr is a cloud-based test management software. Users can manage test cases, conduct test runs and integrate with bug and time tracking tools. Tuskr is available via a free plan, and with a 30-day free trial of paid tier features.
$45
per month 5 users (minimum)
Pricing
aqua cloudTestRailTuskr
Editions & Modules
aqua cloud
Contact Us
per month per user
aqua enterprise cloud
custom price quote
Professional Cloud
$35
per month billed annually per user
Professional Cloud
$38
per month per user
Enterprise Cloud
$71
per month billed annually per user
Team
$9
per month per user
Business
$15
per month per user
Enterprise
$29
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
aqua cloudTestRailTuskr
Free Trial
YesYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details*plus 20% for Maintenance & Support16% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
aqua cloudTestRailTuskr
Considered Multiple Products
aqua cloud

No answer on this topic

TestRail

No answer on this topic

Tuskr
Chose Tuskr
So far I prefer Tuskr over TestRail. I haven't explored everything, but Tuskr seems more modern, and more refined. While there are still issues to be resolved, TestRail was expensive, and their payment philosophy left a lot to be desired.
Chose Tuskr
Tuskr has better visual representations and is much easier to setup and use compared to other platforms
Chose Tuskr
Inexpensive providing same level of features. Covers all our necessary requirements in test management. Made my task easy in familiarising the test plan to my juniors. Simple to use UI is easy to understand and does not require much knowledge sharing. One of the best customer …
Features
aqua cloudTestRailTuskr
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
aqua cloud
9.3
1 Ratings
14% above category average
TestRail
7.5
3 Ratings
8% below category average
Tuskr
10.0
24 Ratings
21% above category average
Centralized test management9.01 Ratings7.63 Ratings10.023 Ratings
Map tests to user stories8.01 Ratings7.63 Ratings00 Ratings
Test execution reporting10.01 Ratings8.23 Ratings10.024 Ratings
Defect management10.01 Ratings7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
aqua cloudTestRailTuskr
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
aqua cloudTestRailTuskr
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
7.4
(3 ratings)
10.0
(25 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
9.3
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
aqua cloudTestRailTuskr
Likelihood to Recommend
Andagon
1. I used this to do test cases, wherein I got the results with visuals. I explained to clients very well with the visual examples as well. 2. Even I was very new to this tool, it gave me the best company. Even while integrating components as a beginner. 3. Even if I have got any bugs in test cases, it helped me to resolve in a better way. Happy user me! Thanks Aqua ALM.
Read full review
Idera, Inc.
The integration with other tools, and their user friendly layout and design. It's very comfortable to use and is way better than other tools with the Automation Testing tools, thanks to the great API that is included. Sometimes the integration with Jira is a little faulty, but the links to that tool usually work well. It could be cool if it had a better following for the bug items that were registered on other tools.
Read full review
Celoxis
Its interface, features and dashboard which help a lot to streamline the workflow. And its really very ease to use. My team and I just use this software and adapt in a week. I surely recommend to any organisation, in regards of pricing, features and interface. And their customer support.
Read full review
Pros
Andagon
  • Writing test case and use case
  • Visuals
  • Very easy to create complex logs in the test case
Read full review
Idera, Inc.
  • Managing test plans and test cases
  • Generation of test results
  • Modularised way of storing tests
Read full review
Celoxis
  • Its easy to import test cases in Tuskr by using the csv import feature
  • Test runs are easy to create and can include test cases from multiple suits.
  • Reports of test runs make it easier to track all the cases that were covered at a particular instance before giving a release signoff.
Read full review
Cons
Andagon
  • I did not find automation of test in this tool, which I did it manually while doing test case
  • Apart from that I did not find anything bad in this tool, looks good
  • NA
Read full review
Idera, Inc.
  • Outstanding user bugs
  • UI is clunky
  • Things are not where you think they would be
Read full review
Celoxis
  • When you click into a specific test, the status automatically clears. it would be nice for this to be preserved when clicking in instead of clearing
  • It would be nice to be able to add comments specific to certain steps in each test, instead of just one big comment box
  • Since we use Tuskr for QA, we structure it as a table with instructions and expected results. because these are side by side, sometimes it is hard to go in a step-by-step order when there are multiple QA steps to take to complete the test.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Andagon
No answers on this topic
Idera, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Celoxis
Tuskr suits our organization needs
Read full review
Usability
Andagon
No answers on this topic
Idera, Inc.
As I am a tester, for me I found this tool to be new in terms of everything like the management of tests, plans, releases, reporting,etc. It is overall a good tool for test reporting and can be used for reference in the future. I liked several features of on the go placement of screenshots. Also I feel like the UI , the font, the color combination can be improved
Read full review
Celoxis
The test case management and automating repetitive tasks, Tuskr saves significant time for my QA teams. The whole process was very easy for my team to adapt and get comfortable with other software. We were continuously able to improve our business and this had a significant positive impact on customer satisfaction and retention.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Andagon
I use aqua ALM for test cases. It has got the integration with Jira. Best thing is it will surely very well connect the organization in only one hub. I will perform test case, use cases.It has got open-source & many tools in one platform. Aqua ALM will our organization to manage, plan and to execute the use cases incidents in clear manner, it also fetches the reports which we give input. By this, we will also download the FLOW reports, visual diagrams. Happy clients! They appreciated my project.
Read full review
Idera, Inc.
TestRail definitely saves times. I work in a company that consists of several development teams, all of which have different processes. Some of the teams leverage test cases, some do not. I've noticed that the turn around time it takes for me to pick up a ticket, QA it, and then pass/fail/send feedback is much faster when there is a test case created as I'm not reading through ticket description/comments to figure out what needs to be QA'd.
Read full review
Celoxis
I have not worked with related testing suite before but Tuskr has been the favorite platform for running test suites. It has generated positive leads from the company data by offering the necessary testing support. It is easy to integrate with other applications to suit business demands. The system generate results from various testing suites that can shared with our clients.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Andagon
  • Once I was working on my project's use case incident, I wanted the result to get in tree view, but I didnt get. Visuals I got, not which is the one I wanted. Anyways I explained the same to clients. so I would highly like the AQUA team to improve this.
  • I really wanted to appreciate that bug reporting in use case incidents. Very good!
  • In one of the projects I wanted to work in the FLOW DIAGRAM VISUAL. I got the excellent result in this. Thank you again :)
Read full review
Idera, Inc.
  • We are able to easily pull reports any time management would like to see them
  • Jira integration makes it easy to attach to stories/defects and save time
  • A quick overview at the system's health as a whole is easy to see from TestRail
Read full review
Celoxis
  • Everyone in the team can go and read how to perform a specific test and note down the result of it which can be viewed by anyone
  • We can filter based on results understanding what test cases are failing from previous runs
  • Helps save a lot of time, effort and minimises future issues
Read full review
ScreenShots

aqua cloud Screenshots

Screenshot of Custom fields to provide additional information and make SDLC more comprehensive and efficientScreenshot of Change tracking in tickets that show when they happened.Screenshot of Screenshot of Activity tracking for teams, with changes in 2 levels:

1) Global (System level)

Displays actions in the system: who reset passwords, changes the roles or licenses, adds a member to a project.

2) Local (Project/folder level)

Tracks who makes changes to the organization and the structure of projects or foldersScreenshot of A customized data-bound report. These contain a broad set of tools to construct report layouts.Screenshot of Role assignment for team members. Enables multiple permissions for them to perform certain tasks.

Tuskr Screenshots

Screenshot of Progress MonitoringScreenshot of Create Flexible test casesScreenshot of Distribute Workload