TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

ARpilot vs. Oracle Textura Payment Management

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    ARpilot

    N/AN/AARPilot is an accounts receivable platform that manages invoice follow-up, payment collection, cash application, disputes, payment plans, and reporting within a tenant-specific environment. The platform uses AI to draft invoice-specific follow-up communications and requires operator approval for outbound actions and accounting-system write-backs. Key Capabilities Invoice follow-up: ARPilot drafts communications using invoice details such…

    $99

    per month

    Oracle Textura Payment Management

    Score9.7 out of 10
    N/AA construction payment management application that helps general contractors, owners, and subcontractors simplify and automate the draw process. Reduces risk by securely managing lien waivers and compliance. Increases visibility to downstream payments to minimize the risk of disruption and ensure the entire supply chain is paid on time for work completed.N/A
    Pricing
    ARpilotOracle Textura Payment Management
    Editions & Modules
    Starter
    $99
    per month
    Professional
    $299
    per month
    Enterprise
    Custom
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ARpilotOracle Textura Payment Management
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    ARpilotOracle Textura Payment Management
    Accounts Receivable
    Comparison of Accounts Receivable features of ARpilot and Oracle Textura Payment Management
    Feature
    ARpilot
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle Textura Payment Management
    7.1
    3 Ratings
    15% below category average
    Invoice Control00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Payment Tracking00 Ratings9.82 Ratings
    Credit Management00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Aging Reports00 Ratings4.01 Ratings
    Customer Statements00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Automatic Reminders00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Payment Reconciliation00 Ratings6.02 Ratings
    Dispute Resolution00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Financial Reports00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
    Integration with Accounting Systems:00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    User Ratings
    ARpilotOracle Textura Payment Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.6
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (3 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ARpilotOracle Textura Payment Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    DALE Labs LLC
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    They are at the top of our list to implement for our subs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    DALE Labs LLC
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    • AIA Billing
    • ACH Payments
    • SOV Management
    • Communications
    • User Management
    • Compliance Holds
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    DALE Labs LLC
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    • Signatory workflow - Logging into the signatory and notary in the same process. There isn't as much separation as there could be.
    • We could use a place to put in our job number. Running reports to ensure we billed everything in our system matches what's in Textura isn't easy because there are different job names.
    • If our authorized signer inadvertently fails to execute the application and the GC closes the draw period, it appears as though the pay application was never submitted. From what I can see, there is no clear audit trail reflecting that it had been prepared or pending signature prior to the draw closing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    DALE Labs LLC
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    It has a great user interface that is regularly being updated and improved. The platform is intuitive and the product team regularly engages with an industry partnership team to make sure it is staying up to date with the way our users expect the tool to perform. They also have the backing of Oracle's robust user base and UI teams
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    DALE Labs LLC
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    Oracle Textura Payment Management is better and more refined than similar products. Procore has a ton of other useful features and GCPay is straightforward with a simple UI. Like most things in tech, it comes down to user base and Oracle Textura Payment Management has the most jobs of ours using it meaning it has the biggest positive impact on our business.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    DALE Labs LLC
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    • We’ve reduced billing-related back-and-forth with GCs.
    • Lien waiver compliance is more controlled and tracked.
    • Cash flow is easier to predict because we receive payment notifications when they are initiated.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    ARpilot Screenshots

    Screenshot of Main DashboardScreenshot of Payment PlansScreenshot of Invoice Disputes