Assembla vs. Sonatype Nexus Repository Community Edition

Assembla works well when you are working with multiple groups or entities. We dealt with different time zones, different levels of involvement with the projects, etc so this allows for us to have responses back in a quicker fashion. It also helps us clue in the appropriate people and rely less on following multiple email chains

Incentivized

Best suited for secure artifact storage and wide distributions, along with compliance and governance support, easy integration with different organization ecosystems. Less suited for projects with minimal dependencies and offline environments with no connectivity to external repositories.

Incentivized

• Assembla assists in the workload balancing of our programmers.
• We are able to use Assembla to manage sprints and sprint planning in our agile format.

Incentivized

• Secure artifact storage and customization
• Compliance components in lifecycle
• Integration in development ecosystems

Incentivized

• The ability to export the tasks or run metrics on them.
• Mobile ability.

Incentivized

• Expanded repository format support
• Detailed dependencies insights
• Integrated Vulnerability management

Incentivized

We selected Assembla because the ticket functionality worked well with our agile planning format that we use company wide.

Incentivized

Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS has some useful features- - Distributed repository management - Insights in component usage - Repository Health check - Smart proxying option

Incentivized

• We were able to spend less time tracking down the status of projects.
• We could become more self-sufficient on reviewing prior resolutions to help with current problems.
• Tasks were responded to quickly because we did not have to email one person, wait for an out of office email and then try someone else. Our task got assigned to the next available person.

Incentivized

• Positive - security standards setup in organization
• Positive - detailed data insights

Incentivized