Asset Panda vs. IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Asset Panda
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Asset Panda is a cloud-based barcoding and asset tracking platform from the company of the same name headquartered in Frisco, Texas, that can possibly displace the need for scanners with standard (mobile phone, tablets) mobile devices in barcode scanning.N/A
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities (formerly Tririga) is an integrated workplace management system (IWMS) supporting facilities management, real estate portfolio management, space management, and environmental / energy management.N/A
Pricing
Asset PandaIBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Asset PandaIBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Asset PandaIBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Features
Asset PandaIBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
IT Asset Management
Comparison of IT Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Asset Panda
8.7
1 Ratings
12% above category average
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
-
Ratings
Software and hardware inventory tracking9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Asset lifecycle monitoring9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Asset relationship management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Asset PandaIBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Small Businesses
Atera
Atera
Score 8.8 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.0 out of 10
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprises
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.0 out of 10
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Asset PandaIBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(5 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Asset PandaIBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Likelihood to Recommend
Asset Panda
It is great to keep track of all assets. I'd like to see a spot where we would put a link to any of our assets with GPS in them, so we do not have to go back and forth. The feature to put serial numbers for equipment is a great feature
Read full review
IBM
It is great for organizations who have complex data or large amounts of data. For an organization that has small amounts of data or very simple processes TRIRIGA might be too much. It can handle small data and processes but the costs of implementing and supporting might be greater than the reward that would be provided. It also has a lot of room to grow. You can utilize existing forms and business objects or you can custom build new ones to fit business needs.
Read full review
Pros
Asset Panda
  • Find the position of assets using their location and synopsis
  • E-signature is used to assets
  • Cloud based tracking from anywhere
  • Assets assigned to users are easily tracked
Read full review
IBM
  • Diverse categories of requests available
  • Ability to be as descriptive as possible without character limit
  • Ease of mass resource assignment for tasks
  • Ease of mass maintenance task/request printing work orders
  • Clean site layout that is easy to navigate
Read full review
Cons
Asset Panda
  • Time-out settings on the website should be increased.
  • Image structure on the way they organized photos could be improved.
  • Barcode scanner on a mobile device could be improved.
  • Photo editor could be improved.
Read full review
IBM
  • In order to get into the back end and manage spaces, there are too many "clicks" and pop up boxes to get to the area that is needed, which causes delays and confusions.
  • It can be a bit slow when processing requests, pulling up maps.
  • Trigia holds a lot of information, which is good but it could be easier to get to at times.
Read full review
Usability
Asset Panda
No answers on this topic
IBM
I give it this rating because it has more than one way to get to most forms but it can be hard to navigate if you don't know the terms TRIRIGA uses. Also being a new developer can bring up issues with not knowing exactly where certain things are found. The documentation doesn't help too much sometimes since the TRIRIGA community is pretty small.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Asset Panda
No answers on this topic
IBM
In the almost 7 months I have been working on my current project there has been exactly one unplanned outage. This was in the QA environment during data migration and was caused by a workflow that was circular and self referencing which caused the processing JAVA memory to spike, not resolve and then crash the server.
Read full review
Performance
Asset Panda
No answers on this topic
IBM
TRIRIGA does a good job of this, being a server based web application it is like other web based systems so it's not as fast as a client server application or a local system but it is very consistent across locations and for different roles and employees. This does allow consistent use no matter where people are located. It also does a fair job of notifying the user when it is loading with the spinning circle or hour glass. The reports can get fairly complex but native TRIRIGA reports perform well even when they are complex. They can be a little slow if they are fetching 100's of 1000's of rows but this doesn't take more than 10 or so seconds. I have yet to write a native report that takes more than 20 seconds and that 20 second report is getting data from 4 BO's and nets over 130K rows.
Read full review
Support Rating
Asset Panda
No answers on this topic
IBM
The process does seem to take some time and has to go through a preset escalation process. IBM does a good job of communicating through the process, it just seems to take it's natural course.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Asset Panda
No answers on this topic
IBM
Do research on the client processes and determine which modules need to be implemented and in which order they should be implemented in.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Asset Panda
Asset Panda is great for fixed assets or small businesses. I have also used inventory in a retail environment where product coming in and out need to be tracked. I wouldn't recommend it for an extremely high volume business.
Read full review
IBM
Much faster web based program with more category options and ease of mass batch printing.
Read full review
Scalability
Asset Panda
No answers on this topic
IBM
TRIRIGA can be split into many servers and is easily scaled over multiple environments. TRIRIGA is also capable of being implemented on multiple operating systems and a wide range of environments with different database management systems. This makes it easy for clients to choose since they can choose vendors they have previous relationships with or are required to use for various reasons.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Asset Panda
  • Quick and easy asset management
Read full review
IBM
  • It's a positive and works well with the business.
  • It doesn't "stand out" from competitors but has great potential if updates were establisthed.
  • The pros outweigh the cons when using Tririga.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Asset Panda Screenshots

Screenshot of The list view of Asset Panda groups.Screenshot of A look inside a single asset record on Asset Panda.Screenshot of Asset Panda's interactive Dashboards.