TrustRadius

AT&T IoT Platform vs. K3s Lightweight Kubernetes

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AT&T IoT Platform
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
AT&T IoT Platform constitutes a suite of tools designed to help developers get products deployed quickly. It provides container services, device services, and data services as well as global connectivity and management. Global Connectivity & Management Purchase, provision, and manage SIMs for all devices, leveraging AT&T LTE-M network for low-power cellular network connectivity, and AT&T global SIM connectivity, thereby providing greater reliability, security, and…N/A
K3s Lightweight Kubernetes
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
K3s is a lightweight, certified Kubernetes distribution built for IoT & Edge computing, developed by Rancher Labs, which is now supported by SUSE since the 2020 acquisition. K3s is available free and open source under the Apache 2.0 license.N/A
Pricing
AT&T IoT PlatformK3s Lightweight Kubernetes
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AT&T IoT PlatformK3s Lightweight Kubernetes
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Features
AT&T IoT PlatformK3s Lightweight Kubernetes
Internet of Things
Comparison of Internet of Things features of Product A and Product B
AT&T IoT Platform
-
Ratings
K3s Lightweight Kubernetes
8.0
1 Ratings
0% above category average
IoT Device Management00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Device Security00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AT&T IoT PlatformK3s Lightweight Kubernetes
Small Businesses
AWS IoT Core
AWS IoT Core
Score 9.9 out of 10
AWS IoT Core
AWS IoT Core
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
AWS IoT Core
AWS IoT Core
Score 9.9 out of 10
AWS IoT Core
AWS IoT Core
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AT&T IoT PlatformK3s Lightweight Kubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
AT&T IoT PlatformK3s Lightweight Kubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend
AT&T
No answers on this topic
SUSE
K3s Lightweight Kubernetes is well suited for local development. K3s Lightweight Kubernetes is not well suited when you need backward support. In the case that you want to test an application that is still using deprecated APIs or CRDs which are supported on popular managed Cloud Kubernetes Distributions, because K3s Lightweight Kubernetes is trying to be a lightweight application and dropping early support for APIs/CRDs marked for deprication K3s Lightweight Kubernetes will not be a good solution. If you are trying to test Kubernetes etc, functionality, K3s Lightweight Kubernetes is not a good case since it's using Dqlite or SQLite.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
AT&T
No answers on this topic
SUSE
  • Virtual clusters
  • IoT devices
  • Local development
  • Raspberry Pi
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
AT&T
No answers on this topic
SUSE
  • Option to deploy a self managed k3s in the cloud
  • Support to deploy it with kubeadm
  • Integration with prometheus & grafana
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
AT&T
No answers on this topic
SUSE
We have mostly used kind, minikube, and Docker Desktop Kubernetes for local development. Only kind has lower resource requirements, but K3s Lightweight Kubernetes seems to be even lighter. It is a big benefit to be able to deploy a K3s Lightweight Kubernetes cluster in seconds locally in our workstation, there is no cost, and it makes it easy to redeploy from scratch no matter how many times we want. The removal of deprecated APIs or CRDs also makes it more secure since it reduces unnecessarily exposed attack vectors.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
AT&T
No answers on this topic
SUSE
  • Engineers have been able to run more microservices locally with K3s Lightweight Kubernetes instead of Minikube, which is more resources hungry
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots