Author-it vs. ONePUBS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Author-it
Score 7.9 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Author-it offers a series of component authoring solutions, described by the vendor as a suite of integrated solutions that give businesses of all sizes the power to create, maintain, review, reuse and localize content, and publish into a full spectrum of outputs.N/A
ONePUBS
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
ONePUBS is a technical document generation and help authoring tool (HAT) from O'Neil & Associates (ONEIL) headquartered in Ohio.N/A
Pricing
Author-itONePUBS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Author-itONePUBS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Author-itONePUBS
Considered Both Products
Author-it
Chose Author-it
Fundamentally a better idea and base design. These tools do not compete
Chose Author-it
In the beginning, we used a Word-based HAT. We switched to Author-it already in 2004. For us, the database-driven approach and the easier management of styles were the game-changers. Compared to XML-based tools, the user-friendliness is a major advantage.
Chose Author-it
These other platforms are more dynamic and easier to use.
ONePUBS

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
Author-itONePUBS
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

MindTouch
MindTouch
Score 7.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Author-itONePUBS
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Author-itONePUBS
Likelihood to Recommend
It’s almost perfect for our needs. In particular, the ability to manage long and complex book structures and control styles and layout via media objects is a huge advantage. The new output options (New Word, ProCSS, AION) represent real improvements. Support in Europe has also improved significantly.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
This platform is not intuitive and is not easy to use. The learning curve is steep for this platform. Also, there are lots of work arounds needed in order for basic items to be processed. We have had to pay for additional IT support and training just to be able to use our platform and has been in service for over 10 years
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Fundamentally a better idea and base design. These tools do not compete
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots