Avatar Systems vs. Corva vs. geoSCOUT

Avatar Systems is appropriate for basic routine medical visit charting. In my opinion, I would not use it for anythin beyond that. I was not impressed with Avatar's capabilities and customization. The system is great for locked down user level permissions.

Incentivized

There are really only 2 tools in industry that have the function of geoSCOUT (the other being Accumap.) Both are similar. I'd recommend geoSCOUT for project/area specific work. I'd recommend Accumap for start-up companies who are trying to establish their 'playground' as it's easier to navigate province wide assets, whereas new maps are required for geoSCOUT.

Incentivized

• Locked down permissions for access

Incentivized

• Well ticket information.
• Spatial analysis.
• Query effectiveness.

Incentivized

• customer service
• customization
• response times to tickets
• tier one support
• post transition support
• functionality improvements for templates
• more robust options for more than basic visit types

Incentivized

• Cross sections are not always that visually appealing. Cross sections from Petrel look much better.

Incentivized

In my opinion, Avatar Systems would rank low on my list when compared to the others.

Incentivized

Accumap is also a similar tool. The two tools contain the same information, although geoSCOUT has extra modules which have been somewhat useful. For the most part, engineers pull raw production, completions and facilities data. geoSCOUT is better for visualizing plans and allowing toggling of different considerations using the layer manager.

Incentivized

• Avatar Systems didn't meet all of our needs, but would for a private practice

Incentivized

• Allowed for efficient information gathering thereby decreasing turnaround time on projects.
• Helpful for competitor analysis.

Incentivized