AVEVA InTouch HMI vs. Cisco Jasper

InTouch by Wonderware is relatively easy to use. The process controls are easy, the design and graphics are some of the most detailed of other SCADA software programs considered. The configuration with the inputs and outputs are easy to use. Essentially, the system is very user friendly and the customer support is fantastic.

Incentivized

Using Cisco Jasper is suitable for managing large numbers of cellular subscribers where manual management is impossible. If you are a prototype project with dozens of subscribers, it may not be convenient for you to deal with Cisco Jasper and opt for manual management. The use of Cisco Jasper is justified in a production and project monetization environment.

Incentivized

• Device integration
• Connectivity management
• Enterprise-grade solution

Incentivized

• Occasionally, it takes a long time for things to load, but that is just a feature.
• There are a few minor glitches, but nothing that affects usage.
• It was assuring security as a vendor-based solution.

In our country, the subscriber management platform is not eligible since each cell phone operator opts for a particular brand, that is, we have not had an option, although we have no complaints about the platform, we feel comfortable using it. I know of other management platforms used by other operators and they are really all very well designed, but we all know about CISCO's track record in the market, which adds additional value.

Incentivized

• We saved an average of 14% on device connectivity costs
• We have an almost 99% uptime thanks to CJ.

Incentivized