TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AWS CodeBuild

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AAWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy.

    $0.01

    Per Minute

    AWS CodePipeline

    Score6.6 out of 10
    N/AAWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that helps users automate release pipelines. CodePipeline automates the build, test, and deploy phases of the release process every time there is a code change, based on the release model a user defines.

    $1

    per active pipeline/per month

    Pricing
    AWS CodeBuildAWS CodePipeline
    Editions & Modules
    general.1.small
    $.005
    Per Minute
    general.1.medium
    $.01
    Per Minute
    general.1.large
    $.02
    Per Minute
    AWS CodePipeline
    $1
    per active pipeline/per month
    Free Tier
    Free
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AWS CodeBuildAWS CodePipeline
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AWS CodeBuildAWS CodePipeline
    Considered Both Products
    Amazon AWS
    Chose AWS CodeBuild
    AWS CodeBuild provides the option to fully implement the build in the cloud without wasting your local resources (computer and network) providing independence to developers to invest those resources in other processes. It also provides a robust platform with a lot of …
    Incentivized
    Amazon AWS
    Chose AWS CodePipeline
    CodeCommit and CodeDeploy can be used with CodePipeline so it’s not really fair to stack them against each other as they can be quite the compliment. The same goes for Beanstalk, which is often used as a deployment target in relation to CodePipeline. CodePipeline fulfills the …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    AWS CodeBuildAWS CodePipeline
    Small Businesses
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    CircleCI
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    CircleCI
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Score9 out of 10
    CircleCI
    Score9.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AWS CodeBuildAWS CodePipeline
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (8 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.8
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.4
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AWS CodeBuildAWS CodePipeline
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    I enjoy it - very cool service. I would say give it a try.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    I think AWS CodePipeline is a great tool for anyone wanted automated deployments in a multi-server/container AWS environment. AWS also offers services like Elastic Beanstalk that provide a more managed hosting & deployment experience. CodePipeline is a good middle ground with solid, built-in automation with enough customizability to not lock people into one deployment or architecture philosophy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • Customization
    • Do code builds within a schedule or when the source code changes
    • Only pay for the build time used
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • It is reliable and works without errors
    • It integrates well with our repository and all other AWS functions as well as our end database
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • It was difficult to create a branching strategy with GitHub. We had everything running from main, but in a true devops environment, we would like to incorporate a true branching strategy.
    • I would like to share build projects with each AWS account we utilize versus creating a build project in each account. It will allow us consistent deployments across the board.
    • The error logs are natively in AWS, but when developers do not have access, there is no way for them to view error logs for maintenance other than an admin who has access to share the error logs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • Ease of use - things like CircleCI or other tools are a bit easier to learn.
    • Ability to build from more sources.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    It is a highly usable, well integrated CI/CD service, patricularly for AWS-centric organizations. It is a strong balance between simplicity and flexibility. Security was integrated with AWS Secrets Manager allowing secrets to be retrieved dynamically - a huge usability win for us. I did not enjoy the manual build for each environment
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    Overall, I give AWS Codepipeline a 9 because it gets the job done and I can't complain much about the web interface as much of the action is taking place behind the scenes on the terminal locally or via Amazon's infrastructure anyway. It would be nicer to have a better flowing and visualizable web interface, however.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Amazon AWS
    Our pipeline takes about 30 minutes to run through. Although this time depends on the applications you are using on either end, I feel that it is a reasonable time to make upgrades and updates to our system as it is not an every day push.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Amazon AWS
    We didn't need a lot of support with AWS CodePipeline as it was pretty straightforward to configure and use, but where we ran into problems, the AWS community was able to help. AWS support agents were also helpful in resolving some of the minor issues we encountered, which we could not find a solution elsewhere.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    AWS CodeBuild provides the option to fully implement the build in the cloud without wasting your local resources (computer and network) providing independence to developers to invest those resources in other processes. It also provides a robust platform with a lot of customizations or just a script for each language.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    CodeCommit and CodeDeploy can be used with CodePipeline so it’s not really fair to stack them against each other as they can be quite the compliment. The same goes for Beanstalk, which is often used as a deployment target in relation to CodePipeline.

    CodePipeline fulfills the CI/CD duty, where the other services do not focus on that specific function. They are supplements, not replacements. CodePipeline will detect the updated code and handle deploying it to the actual instance via Beanstalk.

    Jenkins is open source and not a native AWS service, that is its primary differentiator. Jenkins can also be used as a supplement to CodePipeline.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • It has a positive ROI
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • CodePipeline has reduced ongoing devops costs for my clients, especially around deployment & testing.
    • CodePipeline has sped up development workflow by making the deployment process automated off git pushes. Deployment takes very little coordination as the system will just trigger based on what is the latest commit in a branch.
    • CodePipeline offered a lot of out-of-the-box functionality that was much simpler to setup than a dedicated CI server. It allowed the deployment process to built and put into production with much less and effort and cost compared to rolling the functionality manually.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots