TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

AWS CodePipeline vs. WSO2 Developer Platform

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AWS CodePipeline

    Score6.6 out of 10
    N/AAWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that helps users automate release pipelines. CodePipeline automates the build, test, and deploy phases of the release process every time there is a code change, based on the release model a user defines.

    $1

    per active pipeline/per month

    WSO2 Developer Platform

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AWSO2 Developer Platform (formerly WSO2 Choreo) is an AI-native Internal Developer Platform (IDP) that functions as a unified control plane for cloud-native application delivery. The platform provides a centralized internal developer portal and execution engine to abstract underlying infrastructure complexity, standardize deployments, and automate the software development lifecycle across Kubernetes environments.

    $0

    1 project, up to 5 components

    Pricing
    AWS CodePipelineWSO2 Developer Platform
    Editions & Modules
    AWS CodePipeline
    $1
    per active pipeline/per month
    Free Tier
    Free
    Free
    $0
    1 project, up to 5 components. $100 in Choreo infrastructure credits per month.
    Pay-As-You-Go
    $150
    per month Up to 10 projects and 30 components. $150 per component per month. Pass-through infrastructure costs.
    Enterprise
    Custom Quote
    per year Unlimited projects and components. Discounts based on annual commitments available. Pass-through infrastructure costs, or use a data plane.
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AWS CodePipelineWSO2 Developer Platform
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—1 step is a maximum of 500ms of compute time. An incoming event, message, or outgoing API call is a minimum of 1 step.
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    AWS CodePipelineWSO2 Developer Platform
    Small Businesses
    CircleCI
    Score9.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    CircleCI
    Score9.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    CircleCI
    Score9.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AWS CodePipelineWSO2 Developer Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (8 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    6.8
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    7.4
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AWS CodePipelineWSO2 Developer Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    I think AWS CodePipeline is a great tool for anyone wanted automated deployments in a multi-server/container AWS environment. AWS also offers services like Elastic Beanstalk that provide a more managed hosting & deployment experience. CodePipeline is a good middle ground with solid, built-in automation with enough customizability to not lock people into one deployment or architecture philosophy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WSO2
    While you are developing your code, my case is codes for bots, you'll have more power and if you have an API ally that shows forecasts of latencies and throughputs: Choreo by WS02 is that friend. It is very ideal in giving insights on intelligent data mapping, code anomalies as you develop the codes or applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • It is reliable and works without errors
    • It integrates well with our repository and all other AWS functions as well as our end database
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WSO2
    • Provides feedback in real time which sorts most of the API performance challenges.
    • Displays the estimated application performance as you compose your code.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • Ease of use - things like CircleCI or other tools are a bit easier to learn.
    • Ability to build from more sources.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WSO2
    • Latency curves may be inaccurate sometimes or provide over/under estimates
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    Overall, I give AWS Codepipeline a 9 because it gets the job done and I can't complain much about the web interface as much of the action is taking place behind the scenes on the terminal locally or via Amazon's infrastructure anyway. It would be nicer to have a better flowing and visualizable web interface, however.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WSO2
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Amazon AWS
    Our pipeline takes about 30 minutes to run through. Although this time depends on the applications you are using on either end, I feel that it is a reasonable time to make upgrades and updates to our system as it is not an every day push.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WSO2
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    We didn't need a lot of support with AWS CodePipeline as it was pretty straightforward to configure and use, but where we ran into problems, the AWS community was able to help. AWS support agents were also helpful in resolving some of the minor issues we encountered, which we could not find a solution elsewhere.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WSO2
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    CodeCommit and CodeDeploy can be used with CodePipeline so it’s not really fair to stack them against each other as they can be quite the compliment. The same goes for Beanstalk, which is often used as a deployment target in relation to CodePipeline.

    CodePipeline fulfills the CI/CD duty, where the other services do not focus on that specific function. They are supplements, not replacements. CodePipeline will detect the updated code and handle deploying it to the actual instance via Beanstalk.

    Jenkins is open source and not a native AWS service, that is its primary differentiator. Jenkins can also be used as a supplement to CodePipeline.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WSO2
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • CodePipeline has reduced ongoing devops costs for my clients, especially around deployment & testing.
    • CodePipeline has sped up development workflow by making the deployment process automated off git pushes. Deployment takes very little coordination as the system will just trigger based on what is the latest commit in a branch.
    • CodePipeline offered a lot of out-of-the-box functionality that was much simpler to setup than a dedicated CI server. It allowed the deployment process to built and put into production with much less and effort and cost compared to rolling the functionality manually.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WSO2
    • over 90 percent accuracy in performance prediction of bots under development
    • It's possible to trace on faulty codes, down to the machine-level details.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    WSO2 Developer Platform Screenshots

    Screenshot of Simultaneous graphical view and code viewScreenshot of API lifecycle managementScreenshot of Automated deploymentScreenshot of API marketplaceScreenshot of Deep observabilityScreenshot of AI-assisted development