TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

AWS Control Tower vs. Cisco TrustSec vs. PingSafe

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AWS Control Tower

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AThe vendor presents AWS Control Tower as the easiest way to set up and govern a new, secure multi-account AWS environment. With AWS Control Tower, builders can provision new AWS accounts in a few clicks, while knowing new accounts conform to company-wide policies.N/A

    Cisco TrustSec

    Score5 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A

    PingSafe

    Score9.8 out of 10
    N/APingSafe is a Cloud Security platform with knowledge of the attackers’ modus operandi. PingSafe helps businesses across various sizes and verticals transform cloud security and eliminate all hidden and exploitable vulnerabilities at blazing-fast speed and scale. It does this by scanning the user's cloud infrastructure from an attacker's lens. The security lapses are identified, prioritized, and auto-remediated to eliminate unwanted business impacts.N/A
    Pricing
    AWS Control TowerCisco TrustSecPingSafe
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AWS Control TowerCisco TrustSecPingSafe
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    AWS Control TowerCisco TrustSecPingSafe
    Small Businesses
    Armor
    Score6 out of 10
    Armor
    Score6 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Trend Micro Deep Security
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Trend Micro Deep Security
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    AWS CloudTrail
    Score8.8 out of 10
    AWS CloudTrail
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Microsoft Defender for Cloud
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AWS Control TowerCisco TrustSecPingSafe
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AWS Control TowerCisco TrustSecPingSafe
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    We were wanting to prove the concept of a low touch process for quickly spinning up boilerplate AWS environments. We were able to get started quickly and to ensure that the AWS Well-Architected Framework principles were followed - at least upfront - however, we found that for our use case and expertise level it ultimately wasn't a fit. We have the skills on our team to manage more of this on our own. My recommendation would be contingent on what skills are already available on your team: if you can "do it yourself" you might as well so that you don't pay for resources you don't need and you have finer grain control over what's created.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • Control access to critical enterprise resources by business role, device type, and location, so policy changes can be made without redesigning the network.
    • Easily manage access control and segmentation while maintaining compliance.
    • Create and manage policies in an easy-to-use matrix.
    • Reduce the need for costly network re-architecture by automating firewall rules and access control list (ACL) administration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PingSafe
    It’s is well suited for a any sized organisation that wants to keep its proactively work on its security posture. Useful in latest compliance status and also track OSINT vulnerabilities.
    Secret tracking in blocking mode can prevent secret leakage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • Easily create new AWS accounts.
    • Easily secure and manage AWS accounts.
    • Landing zone with SSO is a huge win for larger teams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • Reduce operational expenses by simplifying network segmentation and defining security groups based on business roles, not IP addresses.
    • Limit the impact of a data breach by quickly isolating and containing threats using technology already in your network.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PingSafe
    • Issue detection
    • Compliance standard reporting
    • Auto remediation
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • The AWS SSO GUI is not very intuitive and determining how to apply policies to users without creating redundant logins has been a challenge.
    • The default guardrails do not fully encompass all the security checks that we needed.
    • There does not appear to be any way to control roles at the IAM level from the control tower account through the GUI.
    • Some features on AWS accounts still require logging into the individual account with the root user and cannot be done from AWS Control Tower.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • Help and solutions if needed, support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PingSafe
    • More details and issues on Azure
    • More integrations with other SAAS applications
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    There is no way to easily close an AWS account whether it was created manually or via the AWS Control Tower. It takes too many steps to close it vs to provision a new AWS account
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    PingSafe
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    Using AWS Systems Manager and other slightly lower level components has been helpful for us to manage parts of our AWS presence at a more granular level than AWS Control Tower was designed for. It's not at all an apples-to-apples comparison as they solve different use cases, but for us, the use case associated with AWS Systems Manager was a better fit for our specific needs and skillsets. We did not need everything that AWS Control Tower was doing for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    PingSafe
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • Less time manually deploying accounts which was error prone.
    • Central logging allowed us to have 1 place to view logs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • Reduction in IT operational costs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PingSafe
    • Helped to proactively mitigate known vulnerabilities
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots