AWW App vs. FigJam

AWW App

0 Reviews and Ratings

FigJam

63 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
AWW App	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	AWW is an online collaborative whiteboard designed for business and education purposes, presented as a cost-effective realtime alternative for smart boards that works on any device and browser and it doesn't require any additional hardware.	N/A
FigJam	Score 7.9 out of 10	N/A	FigJam is an online interactive whiteboard from Figma headquartered in San Francisco, presently in beta (2021) but available to the public in a free trial. The vendor states that in 2022, FigJam will have plans for $0, $8, and $15 per editor, per month.	$5 per month per editor

Pricing

AWW App

FigJam

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

FigJam Professional: $36
per year per editor
FigJam Organization: $60
per year per editor

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
AWW App	FigJam
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	AWW App	FigJam
Top Pros	No answers on this topic	Pro Live collaboration
Top Cons	No answers on this topic	Minus Ability to work Minus Different documents

Best Alternatives
	AWW App	FigJam
Small Businesses	Canva Score 9.2 out of 10	Canva Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Canva Score 9.2 out of 10	Canva Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises	Miro Score 9.0 out of 10	Miro Score 9.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	AWW App	FigJam
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	6.7 (3 ratings)

User Testimonials
	AWW App	FigJam
Likelihood to Recommend	AWW app No answers on this topic	Figma It is well suited when people use it to sketch the first wireframes of the UX, like the Breadboarding technique from Basecamp. I used to work like that when modifying some UX. Our designers used to sketch over our current experience wireframe, and then we could discuss it by using the comments in Figjam or the Call feature at FigJam. That made it easy to discuss it. When building up group boards to discuss ideas, I use Miro, once it has more native pre-sets that help conducts the discussion. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	AWW app No answers on this topic	Figma One file, auto updated, no need to get latest Easy to preview Lack of client is benefit to some (not me) Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	AWW app No answers on this topic	Figma Less Rigidity Ability to work with Different Documents A light version of Figma Incentivized RL Rogelio Leal UX/UI Designer Read full review
Alternatives Considered	AWW app No answers on this topic	Figma Positive: FigJam is cheaper than Miro and allows connecting with FigJam, where we design our user interfaces. FigJam is more complete and visually appealing than draw.io, although draw.io is free. FigJam allows calls, which both competitors do not. Negative: Miro has more pre-set diagrams than FigJam and they are native and easy to use FigJam is paid, while draw.io is not. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	AWW app No answers on this topic	Figma I believe that creating professional projects inside a web app feels amateurish. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots