Azure Bastion vs. Cisco Secure Firewall

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Bastion
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Azure Bastion is a managed service that provides more secure and seamless Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) and Secure Shell Protocol (SSH) access to virtual machines (VMs) without any exposure through public IP addresses.
$0.19
per hour
Cisco Secure Firewall
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Secure Firewall delivers comprehensive threat protection for modern, distributed networks. Built to support hybrid workforces and multicloud environments, it enables Zero Trust access, application visibility, and secure remote connectivity. With integration across the Cisco Secure portfolio, including SecureX and Talos threat intelligence, the firewall powers organizations to detect and stop more sophisticated threats. Centralized management simplifies policy enforcement, orchestration,…N/A
Pricing
Azure BastionCisco Secure Firewall
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure BastionCisco Secure Firewall
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure BastionCisco Secure Firewall
Features
Azure BastionCisco Secure Firewall
Firewall
Comparison of Firewall features of Product A and Product B
Azure Bastion
-
Ratings
Cisco Secure Firewall
8.0
140 Ratings
8% below category average
Identification Technologies00 Ratings8.2124 Ratings
Visualization Tools00 Ratings7.4126 Ratings
Content Inspection00 Ratings8.0123 Ratings
Policy-based Controls00 Ratings8.5131 Ratings
Active Directory and LDAP00 Ratings8.3114 Ratings
Firewall Management Console00 Ratings7.6130 Ratings
Reporting and Logging00 Ratings7.7132 Ratings
VPN00 Ratings8.0117 Ratings
High Availability00 Ratings8.5126 Ratings
Stateful Inspection00 Ratings8.5122 Ratings
Proxy Server00 Ratings7.370 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure BastionCisco Secure Firewall
Small Businesses
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.1 out of 10
pfSense
pfSense
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.0 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.0 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure BastionCisco Secure Firewall
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.9
(146 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(4 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(3 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(4 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(80 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(4 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(3 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure BastionCisco Secure Firewall
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
It is the best suited to access your Azure VM's fast, secure and with a reliable connection. It may be less suitable then and RDP connection in case you need more customization with your networking especcially with your subnets. Also copy paste feature can be a limitation.
Read full review
Cisco
This security solution is well-suited for a complex environment that requires a scalable and secure solution with granular control. It is also recommended that it be implemented with other Cisco security solutions. Requirements are Security-First. It is less appropriate in a small business scenario where advanced configurations are not required. It should be well-trained on this solution.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Fast browser based connection
  • Secure and Reliable
  • Ease of use
Read full review
Cisco
  • It's good at segregating networks and ensuring that you only give the access that you need to give. Especially with medical devices, you want to only give the access that they need and keep them in their own separate areas so that they can't just communicate with the rest of the network. It's also good at the border for keeping attackers out of the network.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Flexibility in copy paste feature (resticts it)
  • More control during the boot of VMs
Read full review
Cisco
  • I wish that the deployment of the updates to the sensors from the FMC was faster.
  • Cisco ASA firewall did a great job of authentication and authorization on the local firewall. FTD does not authorize users well in terms that an AAA must be setup to provide the granular tools that the ASA did.
  • Cisco's method of licensing the firewall can be improved. The FMC and the FTD are licensed through the Cisco software manager and there are instances where the devices are licensed but the firewall still displays and error due to licensing.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
It works really well. We can do most anything we want or need to with it, and you don’t have to have a doctorate or multiple certs to necessarily figure it out. The thing that would probably have to happen to make us switch would be if we just got priced out - Cisco’s more powerful and higher bandwidth models cost a pretty penny.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
i think overall after ALOT of tac cases it works allright now. But still have alot of issues if you use cloud based mangement. fx, if you open 2 windows of access policys, both of the pages, rules starte to jump form side to side. if you then open one more list, its start to jump even faster. if you close the 2 of them, its back to normal. ALSO the extended access lists for VPN, SUCKS. Its the tiniest window when opening the editor, and you are not able to give the rules names, Which means finding and editing rules SUCKS, its a horrible experience, and eveytime we have to we want to yell :P
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
would rate Cisco Secure Firewall’s availability a 9 out of 10.
In our production environments at Rackspace, the platform has been consistently reliable. We’ve deployed it in high-availability pairs, and failover works as expected with minimal disruption. Over the past several quarters, we’ve had no major unplanned outages directly attributable to the firewall itself.
The software has been stable
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
no slowing down, vpn is working fast
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
Firewall support is professional just like any other technology Cisco sells. From answering simple questions to bringing out outages affecting a large population of our workforce, Cisco support is always courteous, professional, and communicates with our team to keep our request on their radar. Some of the brightest people I've met are from Cisco support both in IQ and EQ which shows the talent Cisco is able to onboard to their team.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
very good
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
was a good training but questions was answered not so good. Training was "Fundamentals of Cisco Firewall Threat Defense and Intrusion Prevention (SFWIPF)".
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
Our initial implementation was aided by Cisco's professional services and was excellent. The engineer was very knowledgeable and helped us work through issues while building out our new internet security edge Part of this involved tools to migrate the firewall configuration from old to new.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Bastion is like one of the best feature of Azure portal as it enables a very easy browser based connection to your VM's in your Azure subscription. It is easier and faster to use RDP .
Read full review
Cisco
Cisco Secure Firewall works better with the Cisco ecosystem when we can utilize it and feels beefy enough when we utilize it in the data center. The Fortinet we have found are great, small cost boxes for remote offices with a better UI then Cisco Secure Firewalls. The feature set included with the firewalls feels similar from a security point of view.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
was not involved
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
you can choose up to 50 devices i think thats enough for our organization
Read full review
Professional Services
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
was not involved
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Very positive as it enabled our admins to connect to servers of our clients from any devices
  • Security and speed
  • Copy Paste needs to be solved
Read full review
Cisco
  • Positive impact. Cisco is a big player in IT environment. It is future stuff, everything, what you learn today, maybe something can be tomorrow. And yes, it's quite important to learn the new stuff every day. And yes, that's it. Yes, I'm happy with Cisco.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Cisco Secure Firewall Screenshots

Screenshot of Cisco Secure 1200 Series Firewall FamilyScreenshot of Cisco Secure 4200 SeriesScreenshot of Cisco Secure 4200 SeriesScreenshot of Cisco Secure Firewall 1200 Stack FamilyScreenshot of Cisco Secure Firewall 200 SeriesScreenshot of Cisco Secure Firewall 200 Series