Azure Container Instances vs. Google Cloud Run
Azure Container Instances vs. Google Cloud Run
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Azure Container Instances | N/A | Microsoft's Azure Container Instances allows developers to focus on building apps without managing virtual machines or having to learn new tools—it's just the application, in a container, running in the cloud. | $0.01 Per GB Per Hour | |
Google Cloud Run | N/A | Google Cloud Run enables users to build and deploy scalable containerized apps written in any language (including Go, Python, Java, Node.js, .NET, and Ruby) on a fully managed platform. Cloud Run can be paired with other container ecosystem tools, including Google's Cloud Build, Cloud Code, Artifact Registry, and Docker. And it features out-of-the-box integration with Cloud Monitoring, Cloud Logging, Cloud Trace, and Error Reporting to ensure the health of an application. | N/A |
| Azure Container Instances | Google Cloud Run | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Azure Container Instances | Google Cloud Run |
|---|
| Azure Container Instances | Google Cloud Run | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Container Management |
|
| Azure Container Instances | Google Cloud Run | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Portainer Score 9.1 out of 10 | Portainer Score 9.1 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Red Hat OpenShift Score 9.2 out of 10 | Red Hat OpenShift Score 9.2 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Red Hat OpenShift Score 9.2 out of 10 | Red Hat OpenShift Score 9.2 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Azure Container Instances | Google Cloud Run | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 8.6 (15 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (1 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 7.4 (2 ratings) |
| Availability | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (1 ratings) |
| Performance | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (1 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (1 ratings) |
| Configurability | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (1 ratings) |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (1 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (1 ratings) |
| Professional Services | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (1 ratings) |
| Vendor post-sale | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (1 ratings) |
| Vendor pre-sale | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (1 ratings) |
| Azure Container Instances | Google Cloud Run | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | Google
|
| Pros | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | Google
|
| Cons | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | Google
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | Google
|
| Usability | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | Google
|
| Reliability and Availability | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | Google
|
| Performance | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | Google
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | Google
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | Google
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | Google
|
| Scalability | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | Google
|
| Professional Services | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | Google
|
| Return on Investment | ![]() Microsoft No answers on this topic | Google
|
| ScreenShots |



