Google's serverless just as you would expect it from Google!
September 21, 2024
Google's serverless just as you would expect it from Google!

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Google Cloud Run
We participated in a trial of modernizing our continuous integration and deployment methods and how we would orchestrate the various resources that need to stand up and down during the different pipelines dynamically. We had to re-architect parts of these pipelines to accommodate the new stateless, serverless infrastructure paradigm. We ran some tests over about a quarter on this and similar offerings.
Pros
- Allocates resources quickly and efficiently.
- It integrates well into the monitoring tools (console) provided.
- Robust API and CLI access.
Cons
- CLI is bloated and can be difficult to get started.
- The learning curve for configuration is higher than expected for a "simple" paradigm.
- Limited storage of any kind requires a significant rethink from stateful pipelines.
- Offloading (in parallel) some non-core functionality (Slack notifications, etc.) via Google Cloud Run gained some performance, resulting in a measurable but slight overall improvement in the time taken to build our pipelines.
The other two obvious cloud providers have direct alternatives: AWS Lambda and Azure Functions. Both were also evaluated briefly (only to validate that they exist); however, the organization had settled on shifting to Google for business reasons, and therefore, the comparison was not made.
Do you think Google Cloud Run delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Google Cloud Run's feature set?
Yes
Did Google Cloud Run live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Google Cloud Run go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Google Cloud Run again?
Yes
Google Cloud Run Feature Ratings
Using Google Cloud Run
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Well integrated Consistent | Unnecessarily complex Difficult to use Requires technical support Slow to learn Lots to learn |
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation