Azure Databricks vs. IBM DataStage

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Databricks
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Azure Databricks is a service available on Microsoft's Azure platform and suite of products. It provides the latest versions of Apache Spark so users can integrate with open source libraries, or spin up clusters and build in a fully managed Apache Spark environment with the global scale and availability of Azure. Clusters are set up, configured, and fine-tuned to ensure reliability and performance without the need for monitoring. The solution includes autoscaling and auto-termination to improve…N/A
IBM DataStage
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
IBM® DataStage® is a data integration tool that helps users to design, develop and run jobs that move and transform data. At its core, the DataStage tool supports extract, transform and load (ETL) and extract, load and transform (ELT) patterns. A basic version of the software is available for on-premises deployment, and the cloud-based DataStage for IBM Cloud Pak® for Data offers automated integration capabilities in a hybrid or multicloud environment.N/A
Pricing
Azure DatabricksIBM DataStage
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure DatabricksIBM DataStage
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure DatabricksIBM DataStage
Features
Azure DatabricksIBM DataStage
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Azure Databricks
8.2
2 Ratings
2% below category average
IBM DataStage
-
Ratings
Connect to Multiple Data Sources6.62 Ratings00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection9.22 Ratings00 Ratings
MDM Integration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Azure Databricks
6.1
2 Ratings
31% below category average
IBM DataStage
-
Ratings
Visualization5.72 Ratings00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis6.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Azure Databricks
8.1
2 Ratings
0% below category average
IBM DataStage
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Transformations8.82 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Encryption9.22 Ratings00 Ratings
Built-in Processors7.32 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Azure Databricks
8.4
2 Ratings
0% below category average
IBM DataStage
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools8.32 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning8.82 Ratings00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development8.22 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery8.22 Ratings00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Azure Databricks
8.6
2 Ratings
1% above category average
IBM DataStage
-
Ratings
Flexible Model Publishing Options8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls9.22 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
Azure Databricks
-
Ratings
IBM DataStage
8.2
11 Ratings
0% below category average
Connect to traditional data sources00 Ratings8.511 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL00 Ratings8.010 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
Azure Databricks
-
Ratings
IBM DataStage
7.7
11 Ratings
5% below category average
Simple transformations00 Ratings8.011 Ratings
Complex transformations00 Ratings7.511 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Azure Databricks
-
Ratings
IBM DataStage
6.9
11 Ratings
13% below category average
Data model creation00 Ratings6.58 Ratings
Metadata management00 Ratings5.010 Ratings
Business rules and workflow00 Ratings7.010 Ratings
Collaboration00 Ratings7.011 Ratings
Testing and debugging00 Ratings6.511 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
Azure Databricks
-
Ratings
IBM DataStage
5.5
10 Ratings
36% below category average
Integration with data quality tools00 Ratings5.510 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools00 Ratings5.510 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure DatabricksIBM DataStage
Small Businesses
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.5 out of 10
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure DatabricksIBM DataStage
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(3 ratings)
7.0
(11 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure DatabricksIBM DataStage
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Suppose you have multiple data sources and you want to bring the data into one place, transform it and make it into a data model. Azure Databricks is a perfectly suited solution for this. Leverage spark JDBC or any external cloud based tool (ADG, AWS Glue) to bring the data into a cloud storage. From there, Azure Databricks can handle everything. The data can be ingested by Azure Databricks into a 3 Layer architecture based on the delta lake tables. The first layer, raw layer, has the raw as is data from source. The enrich layer, acts as the cleaning and filtering layer to clean the data at an individual table level. The gold layer, is the final layer responsible for a data model. This acts as the serving layer for BI For BI needs, if you need simple dashboards, you can leverage Azure Databricks BI to create them with a simple click! For complex dashboards, just like any sql db, you can hook it with a simple JDBC string to any external BI tool.
Read full review
IBM
DataStage is somewhat outdated for an ETL. I guess that's what makes it a bit lagged behind its competitors. It can be used for data processing, sure, but its performance seems to be lagging behind or quite slow given the server it is running from. I won’t depend on this application if it's handling a lot of mission-critical banking and business data.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • SQL
  • Data management
  • Data access
Read full review
IBM
  • Connect to multiple types of data-sources including Oracle, Teradata, Snowflake, SQl Server.
  • Powerful tool to load large volumes of data.
  • Transformation stages allow us to reduce the amount of code needed to create ETL scripts.
  • Allow us to synchronize and refresh data as much as needed.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Their pipeline workflow orchestration is pretty primitive. Lacks some common features
  • Workspace UI and navigation requires steep learning curve
  • Personally, I am not fond of their autosave feature. Its dangerous for production level notebooks scripts
Read full review
IBM
  • Technical support is a key area IBM should improve for this product. Sometimes our case is assigned to a support engineer and he has no idea of the product or services.
  • Provide custom reports for datastage jobs and performance such as job history reports, warning messages or error messages.
  • Make it fully compatible with Oracle and users can direct use of Oracle ODBC drivers instead of Data Direct driver. Same for SQL server.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Based on my extensive use of Azure Databricks for the past 3.5 years, it has evolved into a beautiful amalgamation of all the data domains and needs. From a data analyst, to a data engineer, to a data scientist, it jas got them all! Being language agnostic and focused on easy to use UI based control, it is a dream to use for every Data related personnel across all experience levels!
Read full review
IBM
Because it is robust, and it is being continuously improved. DS is one of the most used and recognized tools in the market. Large companies have implemented it in the first instance to develop their DW, but finding the advantages it has, they could use it for other types of projects such as migrations, application feeding, etc.
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
IBM
It could load thousands of records in seconds. But in the Parallel version, you need to understand how to particionate the data. If you use the algorithms erroneously, or the functionalities that it gives for the parsing of data, the performance can fall drastically, even with few records. It is necessary to have people with experience to be able to determine which algorithm to use and understand why.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
IBM
IBM offers different levels of support but in my experience being and IBM shop helps to get direct support from more knowledgeable technicians from IBM. Not sure on the cost of having this kind of support, but I know there's also general support and community blogs and websites on the Internet make it easy to troubleshoot issues whenever there's need for that.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Against all the tools I have used, Azure Databricks is by far the most superior of them all! Why, you ask? The UI is modern, the features are never ending and they keep adding new features. And to quote Apple, "It just works!" Far ahead of the competition, the delta lakehouse platform also fares better than it counterparts of Iceberg implementation or a loosely bound Delta Lake implementation of Synapse
Read full review
IBM
With effective capabilities and easy to manipulate the features and easy to produce accurate data analytics and the Cloud services Automation, this IBM platform is more reliable and easy to document management. The features on this platform are equipped with excellent big data management and easy to provide accurate data analytics.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Helped reduce time for collecting data
  • Reduced cost in maintaining multiple data sources
  • Access for multiple users and management of users/data in a single platform
Read full review
IBM
  • It’s hard to say at this point, it delivers, but not quite as I expected. It takes a lot of resources to manage and sort this out (manpower, financial).
  • Definitely, I don’t have the exact numbers, but given the data it processes, it is A LOT. So props to the developer of this application.
  • Again, based on my experience, I’d choose other ETL apps if there is one that's more user-friendly.
Read full review
ScreenShots