Azure Databricks vs. IBM Machine Learning for z/OS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Databricks
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Azure Databricks is a service available on Microsoft's Azure platform and suite of products. It provides the latest versions of Apache Spark so users can integrate with open source libraries, or spin up clusters and build in a fully managed Apache Spark environment with the global scale and availability of Azure. Clusters are set up, configured, and fine-tuned to ensure reliability and performance without the need for monitoring. The solution includes autoscaling and auto-termination to improve…N/A
IBM Machine Learning for z/OS
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Machine Learning for z/OS® brings AI to transactional applications on IBM zSystems. It can embed machine learning and deep learning models to deliver real-time insight, or inference every transaction with minimal impact to operational SLAs.N/A
Pricing
Azure DatabricksIBM Machine Learning for z/OS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure DatabricksIBM Machine Learning for z/OS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure DatabricksIBM Machine Learning for z/OS
Features
Azure DatabricksIBM Machine Learning for z/OS
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Azure Databricks
7.0
3 Ratings
17% below category average
IBM Machine Learning for z/OS
-
Ratings
Connect to Multiple Data Sources6.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources7.33 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection6.73 Ratings00 Ratings
MDM Integration7.42 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Azure Databricks
7.3
3 Ratings
14% below category average
IBM Machine Learning for z/OS
-
Ratings
Visualization7.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis7.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Azure Databricks
8.0
3 Ratings
2% below category average
IBM Machine Learning for z/OS
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Transformations8.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Encryption9.63 Ratings00 Ratings
Built-in Processors7.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Azure Databricks
7.4
3 Ratings
12% below category average
IBM Machine Learning for z/OS
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools5.23 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning8.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Azure Databricks
7.9
3 Ratings
7% below category average
IBM Machine Learning for z/OS
-
Ratings
Flexible Model Publishing Options7.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls8.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure DatabricksIBM Machine Learning for z/OS
Small Businesses
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.6 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure DatabricksIBM Machine Learning for z/OS
Likelihood to Recommend
9.7
(3 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
4.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure DatabricksIBM Machine Learning for z/OS
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Centralised notebooks are out directly into production. This can lead to poorly engineered code. It is very good for fast queries and our data team are always able to provide what we ask for. It is a big cost to our business so it is important it runs efficiently and returns on our investment.
Read full review
IBM
IBM Watson Machine Learning is an AI-based scalable self-learning model for any type of business. It can be used to help any company automate repetitive tasks, predict future trends, and make data-driven decisions. I used it to predict stock prices based on certain variables. It works well, cost me nothing, and gives me the ability to create my own AI-based models that I can use for any purpose.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Data Processing and Transformations based on Spark
  • Delta Lakehouse when clubbed with an external cloud storage
  • Governance using Unity Catalog to unify IAM
  • Delta Live Tables is a product, which although relatively newer, has a great potential with the visuals of a pipeline.
Read full review
IBM
  • Good machine learning tool
  • Easy integration
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Intuitive interface
  • Ease of use
  • Providing FAQ or QRGs
Read full review
IBM
  • Proper usage of REST API documentation is missing.
  • Not localization friendly, cannot support regional or local language documents.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Great for what we use day to day and does what we need it to do. Cost management is not fully developed across the UX and gets expensive very quickly for developing projects. Integrated very well with our Microsoft stack and can be worked on collaboratively which works well for us.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
IBM
IBM had a hard time providing business level support. There were a lot of data scientists and technology experts but rarely a simple business person shows up. Also the way IBM operates IBM Consulting has competing priorities as compared to IBM Technology. This has resulted in a lot of confusion at the client's end.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Against all the tools I have used, Azure Databricks is by far the most superior of them all! Why, you ask? The UI is modern, the features are never ending and they keep adding new features. And to quote Apple, "It just works!" Far ahead of the competition, the delta lakehouse platform also fares better than it counterparts of Iceberg implementation or a loosely bound Delta Lake implementation of Synapse
Read full review
IBM
We have been using Microsoft Azure as a machine learning tool. But the challenges remain the same. These are all tools that you need a robust analysis before a decision on the tool. Unfortunately, the technology company cannot make that determination due to lack of core business understanding. Without that the project is doomed.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Helped reduce time for collecting data
  • Reduced cost in maintaining multiple data sources
  • Access for multiple users and management of users/data in a single platform
Read full review
IBM
  • Create secure business environment.
  • Save upto 90% of manual labor.
  • Improve my sales and marketing ROI.
Read full review
ScreenShots