Azure DevOps Server vs. QA Sphere
Azure DevOps Server vs. QA Sphere
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Azure DevOps Server | N/A | Azure DevOps Server (formerly Team Foundation Server, or TFS) is the on-premise version of Azure DevOps. To license Azure DevOps Server an Azure DevOps license and a Windows operating system license (e.g. Windows Server) for each machine running Azure DevOps Server. | N/A | |
QA Sphere | N/A | QA Sphere is a cloud-based Test Management system for planning, organizing, executing, and reporting on manual and exploratory software tests. The platform centralizes test cases, test runs, results, requirements, and linked defects. Key Capabilities Test case management: Teams can organize test cases by folder, tag, priority, and project. Parameterized cases support multiple data variations without duplicating the test steps. Test suites can be imported and… | $12 per month per user |
| Azure DevOps Server | QA Sphere | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | QA Sphere is priced per user per month. The Free plan covers up to 3 users with 1 GB of attachment storage, full API and integration access, and a capped allowance of AI generations. Standard is $12 per user per month and adds unlimited projects, 20 GB of attachment storage, Google SSO, unlimited free read-only viewer seats for stakeholders, and AI test case generation and bug reporting without credit metering. Business is $24 per user per month for teams needing higher limits and additional administrative controls. Custom enterprise terms are available, and a 30-day trial requires no credit card. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Azure DevOps Server | QA Sphere |
|---|
| Azure DevOps Server | QA Sphere | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | GitHub Score 9.2 out of 10 | BrowserStack Score 8.5 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | GitHub Score 9.2 out of 10 | OpenText ALM/Quality Center Score 9.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Perforce P4 Score 7.5 out of 10 | OpenText ALM/Quality Center Score 9.3 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Azure DevOps Server | QA Sphere | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 (48 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Usability | 6.0 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Support Rating | 8.4 (10 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 (2 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Azure DevOps Server | QA Sphere | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() Microsoft
| Hypersequent DMCC No answers on this topic |
| Pros | ![]() Microsoft
| Hypersequent DMCC No answers on this topic |
| Cons | ![]() Microsoft
| Hypersequent DMCC No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() Microsoft
| Hypersequent DMCC No answers on this topic |
| Usability | ![]() Microsoft
| Hypersequent DMCC No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | ![]() Microsoft
| Hypersequent DMCC No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating | ![]() Microsoft
| Hypersequent DMCC No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() Microsoft
| Hypersequent DMCC No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | ![]() Microsoft
| Hypersequent DMCC No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | QA Sphere Screenshots |







