Azure DevOps Server vs. SiteVision

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure DevOps Server
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Azure DevOps Server (formerly Team Foundation Server, or TFS) is the on-premise version of Azure DevOps. To license Azure DevOps Server an Azure DevOps license and a Windows operating system license (e.g. Windows Server) for each machine running Azure DevOps Server.N/A
SiteVision
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
SiteVision is a web application development and hosting platform with specific integrations like geographic information systems (GIS) and emergency management.N/A
Pricing
Azure DevOps ServerSiteVision
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure DevOps ServerSiteVision
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure DevOps ServerSiteVision
Best Alternatives
Azure DevOps ServerSiteVision
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.0 out of 10
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure DevOps ServerSiteVision
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(48 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure DevOps ServerSiteVision
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Azure DevOps is good to use if you are all-in on the Microsoft Azure stack. It's fully integrated across Azure so it is a point-and-click for most of what you will need to achieve. If you are new to Azure make sure you get some outside experience to help you otherwise it is very easy to overcomplicate things and go down the wrong track, or for you to manually create things that come out of the box.
Read full review
SiteVision, Inc.
well suited scenarios are : 1. In terms of architectural context its well suited to know the exact location by 3D Model approach. 2. Its excellent to use in civil construction firms to get the exact distance management approach and to get the best design approach. Less appropriate: 1. For those projects which are not outside or in outdoors its less suited to use there. 2. AR technology +3D tech could be seen in the areas having great land coverage
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Reporting Integration- Azure boards provides Kanban and other dashboard, their templates for easy management of project.
  • Project Pipeline- easy integration and development of CI/CD pipelines, helped in testing, releasing project artifacts.
  • Version Control- Integration with Git and code IDE made it easy to share, review our code, fix bugs and do testing.
Read full review
SiteVision, Inc.
  • Get the exact AR version of the project site
  • Helps in distance management on the site by measuring the spatial points.
  • Helps in power management too.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Can add more build templates for specific technology requirements
  • Can have more features in dashboards which can help dev teams stream line their tasks and priorities
  • Can have raise alarm feature in case of any sort of failure in devops pipeline execution
Read full review
SiteVision, Inc.
  • cloud services could be improved much.
  • accuracy could be enhanced for the hardware tools like GNSS
  • The AR technology could be mixed with the other latest updates to make the system more efficient and light.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Because we are a Microsoft Gold Partner we utilize most of their software and we have so much invested in Team Foundation Server now it would take a catastrophic amount of time and resources to switch to a different product.
Read full review
SiteVision, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
For standard users the interface is friendly. but if you are a manager some tools are a little confusing to use, like the query system that you always need to create from scratch. Templates should be more helpful for queries and for standard procedures that you need to duplicate PBIs over time. The search history of Work Items is a little painful to use.
Read full review
SiteVision, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
I have not had to use the support for Azure DevOps Server. There have never been any issues where I was not able to figure it out or quickly resolve. Our Scrum Master has used support before though, and the service has always been prompt and clear with a customer-focus
Read full review
SiteVision, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Do research beforehand and, if possible, do a trial run before implementing into production environment.
Read full review
SiteVision, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
In my opinion, DevOps covers the development process end to end way better than Jira or GitHub. Both competitors are nice in their specific fields but DevOps provides a more comprehensive package in my opinion. It is still crazy to see that the whole suite can be used for free. The productivity increase we realized with DevOps is worth real money!
Read full review
SiteVision, Inc.
1. Easy to use 2. Easy to accessible from play store 3. Clarity of the apps shown in the screen. 4. Help center is very helpful. 5. Accuracy is very good as compare to other apps. 6. Distance management and AR tech mix up is really appreciable. 7. Power management is nice add on feature
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • It has streamlined the pipeline and project management for our agile effort.
  • It has helped our agile team get organized since that is a new methodology being leveraged within the Enterprise.
  • The calendar has improved visibility into different OOOs across the project team since we all come from different departments across the larger organization.
Read full review
SiteVision, Inc.
  • got the clear contextual clarity of the site
  • Exact augmented points are there so that spatial data could be more enhanced.
  • power management is an excellent approach which has a greater impact on the project.
Read full review
ScreenShots