TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Firewall Manager

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AAzure Firewall Manager provides central network security policy and route management for globally distributed, software-defined perimeters. It offers centralized configuration and management of multiple Azure Firewall instances, across Azure regions and subscriptions.

    $100

    per policy per region

    Cisco Security Cloud Control

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ACisco Security Cloud Control helps the user consistently manage policies across Cisco security products. It is a cloud-based application that cuts through complexity to save time and keep your organization protected against the latest threats.N/A
    Pricing
    Azure Firewall ManagerCisco Security Cloud Control
    Editions & Modules
    Azure Firewall Manager Integrations
    $0.40
    per deployment hour
    Azure Firewall Manager
    $100
    per policy per region
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Firewall ManagerCisco Security Cloud Control
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Azure Firewall ManagerCisco Security Cloud Control
    Firewall Security Management
    Comparison of Firewall Security Management features of Azure Firewall Manager and Cisco Security Cloud Control
    Feature
    Azure Firewall Manager
    7.2
    3 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Cisco Security Cloud Control
    7.3
    3 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Policy planning and rule management7.03 Ratings9.13 Ratings
    Automated Policy Orchestration8.52 Ratings7.33 Ratings
    Device Discovery6.33 Ratings7.33 Ratings
    Policy Compliance Auditing7.73 Ratings7.33 Ratings
    Attack Path Simulation Testing8.03 Ratings4.62 Ratings
    Anomalous Event or Behavior Deviation7.33 Ratings6.42 Ratings
    Vulnerability Scans6.03 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Firewall Rule Cleanup7.03 Ratings7.33 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Azure Firewall ManagerCisco Security Cloud Control
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.3
    (3 ratings)
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure Firewall ManagerCisco Security Cloud Control
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    Azure Firewall manager is best suited where you have multiple firewalls, and we can manage it centrally in one dashboard. Less appropriate for small companies as it is a bit expensive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    Cisco Defense Orchestrator is an ideal software to easily manage firewalls at the enterprise level, as well as to implement security policies that allow the corporate infrastructure to remain free of threats that can put at risk all the devices that are handled on a daily basis. For example, it is ideal for preventing network intrusions, since it has the ability to block malware and any suspicious activity. In addition, the fact that it is based on a single console provides the benefit of keeping all devices under view and thus preventing any threat in the simplest way.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Security
    • Firewall
    • Traffic
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • Upgrade OS
    • Manage changes at scale
    • Group like configurations
    • Clone configs for other firewalls
    • Migrate from on prem to cloud
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Bulk IP address fails, requires you to split it up smaller
    • Firewall Rules dont always have good descriptions
    • No Traffic Splitting
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • Better templates like pushing config. when a particular firewall checks in with CDO.
    • Compliance checking for configurations would be great. For example: make sure http is shut and https is open.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    I give this score because I believe that Cisco Defense Orchestrator helps our company to be resilient, this is because this software is also focused on offering security resilience at the enterprise level, that is, through its features such as high visibility, acceleration of threat detection and response, simple management, and end-to-end protection. By having it, it is more feasible to avoid disasters or risks in the devices that are handled daily and of course avoid data loss and, given this, be able to recover quickly if something happens.
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    I believe that Cisco Defense Orchestrator is available when needed, this solution has allowed the security team to have better productivity thanks to the fact that their workflow is less intense because they can carry out their tasks with the help of this software, in addition to the presence If there is an error, they can be overcome quickly because their support team is efficient.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    Cisco Defense Orchestrator is a software that is easy to implement, although knowledge is required for it, but if you do not have it, going to its valuable support team is very helpful. If done knowingly, this process can take less than two hours. Having a simple implementation is a valuable feature because it saves time and expense.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    We Selected Azure Firewall Manager because of its reliable service and Security, which they provide across our network architecture.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    We used the on box management platform. This required API usage for automating things. It was not scalable and a lot of features are not there. There are platforms like manage engine, but they are not Cisco FP native and had limitations as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Externally hosted firewall.
    • No cost having on Orem appliance.
    • Cheaper as we only pay for what is use in Azure for it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • Much faster management.
    • Can access firewall without having to go on site if the VPN tunnel is down.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots