Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is designed to make deploying and managing containerized applications easy. It offers serverless Kubernetes, an integrated continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) experience, and enterprise-grade security and governance. It allows development and operations teams on a single platform to rapidly build, deliver, and scale applications with confidence.N/A
Pricing
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Considered Both Products
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Chose Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
This depends fully on your needs respectively what you expect or the amount of work you can deal with.
Both services are not the silver bullet that will take care of all your pain points. It is needed to analyze/evaluate them carefully and then decide which makes the most …
Chose Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Amazon EKS stacked up very well and had better performance in some areas. However, Azure Kubernetes Service was a better fit given our Azure environment.
Chose Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
AKS is more powerful than Azure App Service for containers, but it is also very complex. It is great for running large container-based applications and microservices, but you need some Kubernetes knowledge to manage it. When compared to EKS, both AKS & Azure App Service are …
Chose Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Straight from the beginning, the Github connections are simpler, the permissions and access for users is simpler. Certificate renewal doesn't need to be a worry. There is an option of node-auto provisioning.

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) makes you do all of the above with less …
Chose Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Integration with other standard azure services make Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) case strong. As we use most of the azure services it is easy to integrate. It is difficult to use EKS as the user interface is not intuitive and difficult to integrate. The services need to be …
Chose Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Due to cost efficiency. And using AZURE cloud for other services as well. Azure Kubernetes Service is more suitable to configure CI/CD pipelines. With a facility of automated or One click deployment and integration of the application. As compared with other Kubernetes Services …
Chose Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Worked with very similar in-house-built Kubernetes/container management system. We are leveraging AKS as it's more robust and stable being in the technical space for quite some time. Also, it has got a vast number of management and security features which makes it more …
Chose Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
The ability to create new instances (i.e. elastic provisioning) is probably the fastest with Azure Kubernetes Service compared to the alternatives that I have looked at. From a pricing perspective, Microsoft always seems to find a way to be more competitive in this area, and …
Chose Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
[Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)] is largely similar to EKS. I use both products fairly interchangeably and the decision comes down to which ecosystem you are part of and the which locations are important to you.
Features
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
7.6
5 Ratings
7% below category average
Security and Isolation8.65 Ratings
Container Orchestration8.05 Ratings
Cluster Management7.45 Ratings
Storage Management7.45 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization8.05 Ratings
Discovery Tools6.95 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks6.45 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery8.05 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging7.65 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(6 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
AKS works very well for running containerized applications that require high availability and scalability. This includes systems like our HRIS platform and customer-facing web applications. AKS is a good choice when applications are broken into multiple services that need independent scaling and deployment. It provides the flexibility needed to manage these architectures effectively. But for single, low-traffic applications or simple internal tools, AKS can be overkill. For scenarios like that Azure App Service would be better.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • AKS makes it easier to replicate data to multiple regions
  • Azure portal make it easier to manage the resources of the organization
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Steep learning curve
  • Expected charges are unclear until you see real production usage
  • Operations teams need to learn an entirely new skill set
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
As already said, the UI/CLI and even terraform are perfectly fine, but certain details could be documented better. For instance, if I want to secure the whole Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) with my own managed keys, then it is very complex and hard to get there. Not really a single source that gives you the whole picture. Besides that, it is still good to use, in most cases intuitive but details mentioned as above can be tricky.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
Microsoft support was really good, whenever we raise any ticket they come back to us within a couple of hours.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Amazon EKS stacked up very well and had better performance in some areas. However, Azure Kubernetes Service was a better fit given our Azure environment.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • We had to spend more time on Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) than on AWS and GCP to get our kubernetes cluster up and running
  • The resources on nodes need to be left out unused, so effectively it is wasting money there
  • It definitely made us spend more time into maintaining kubernetes
Read full review
ScreenShots