TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft's Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is designed to make deploying and managing containerized applications easy. It offers serverless Kubernetes, an integrated continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) experience, and enterprise-grade security and governance. It allows development and operations teams on a single platform to rapidly build, deliver, and scale applications with confidence.N/A
    Pricing
    Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
    Free Trial
    No
    Free/Freemium Version
    No
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    No
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    Chose Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
    This depends fully on your needs respectively what you expect or the amount of work you can deal with.
    Both services are not the silver bullet that will take care of all your pain points. It is needed to analyze/evaluate them carefully and then decide which makes the most …
    Incentivized
    Chose Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
    Amazon EKS stacked up very well and had better performance in some areas. However, Azure Kubernetes Service was a better fit given our Azure environment.
    Incentivized
    Chose Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
    AKS is more powerful than Azure App Service for containers, but it is also very complex. It is great for running large container-based applications and microservices, but you need some Kubernetes knowledge to manage it. When compared to EKS, both AKS & Azure App Service are …
    Incentivized
    Chose Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
    Straight from the beginning, the Github connections are simpler, the permissions and access for users is simpler. Certificate renewal doesn't need to be a worry. There is an option of node-auto provisioning.

    Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) makes you do all of the above with less …
    Incentivized
    Chose Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
    Integration with other standard azure services make Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) case strong. As we use most of the azure services it is easy to integrate. It is difficult to use EKS as the user interface is not intuitive and difficult to integrate. The services need to be …
    Incentivized
    Chose Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
    Due to cost efficiency. And using AZURE cloud for other services as well. Azure Kubernetes Service is more suitable to configure CI/CD pipelines. With a facility of automated or One click deployment and integration of the application. As compared with other Kubernetes Services …
    Incentivized
    Chose Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
    Worked with very similar in-house-built Kubernetes/container management system. We are leveraging AKS as it's more robust and stable being in the technical space for quite some time. Also, it has got a vast number of management and security features which makes it more …
    Incentivized
    Chose Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
    The ability to create new instances (i.e. elastic provisioning) is probably the fastest with Azure Kubernetes Service compared to the alternatives that I have looked at. From a pricing perspective, Microsoft always seems to find a way to be more competitive in this area, and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
    [Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)] is largely similar to EKS. I use both products fairly interchangeably and the decision comes down to which ecosystem you are part of and the which locations are important to you.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    90%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    90%
    Delivers good value for the price
    9 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    80%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    78%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    Features
    Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
    Container Management
    Comparison of Container Management features of Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
    Feature
    Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
    7.8
    5 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Security and Isolation8.75 Ratings
    Container Orchestration8.05 Ratings
    Cluster Management8.05 Ratings
    Storage Management7.85 Ratings
    Resource Allocation and Optimization7.95 Ratings
    Discovery Tools7.25 Ratings
    Update Rollouts and Rollbacks7.05 Ratings
    Self-Healing and Recovery8.15 Ratings
    Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging7.55 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
    Small Businesses
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SUSE Rancher
    Score9.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.4
    (10 ratings)
    Usability
    7.7
    (5 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    AKS works very well for running containerized applications that require high availability and scalability. This includes systems like our HRIS platform and customer-facing web applications. AKS is a good choice when applications are broken into multiple services that need independent scaling and deployment. It provides the flexibility needed to manage these architectures effectively. But for single, low-traffic applications or simple internal tools, AKS can be overkill. For scenarios like that Azure App Service would be better.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • AKS makes it easier to replicate data to multiple regions
    • Azure portal make it easier to manage the resources of the organization
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Steep learning curve
    • Expected charges are unclear until you see real production usage
    • Operations teams need to learn an entirely new skill set
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    As already said, the UI/CLI and even terraform are perfectly fine, but certain details could be documented better. For instance, if I want to secure the whole Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) with my own managed keys, then it is very complex and hard to get there. Not really a single source that gives you the whole picture. Besides that, it is still good to use, in most cases intuitive but details mentioned as above can be tricky.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    Microsoft support was really good, whenever we raise any ticket they come back to us within a couple of hours.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    Amazon EKS stacked up very well and had better performance in some areas. However, Azure Kubernetes Service was a better fit given our Azure environment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • We had to spend more time on Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) than on AWS and GCP to get our kubernetes cluster up and running
    • The resources on nodes need to be left out unused, so effectively it is wasting money there
    • It definitely made us spend more time into maintaining kubernetes
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots