TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure NetApp Files vs. CenturyLink Public Cloud (discontinued)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure NetApp Files

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AAzure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology, giving users the file capabilities in Azure that core business applications require, with pricing plans for different performance tiers.

    $0.02

    per month

    CenturyLink Public Cloud (discontinued)

    Score6.3 out of 10
    N/ACenturyLink Public Cloud was a set of IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, DBaaS and cloud management tools. Later rebranded to Lumen, Lumen recommends the service's former customers migrate to Lumen Cloud Connect.N/A
    Pricing
    Azure NetApp FilesCenturyLink Public Cloud (discontinued)
    Editions & Modules
    Restore
    $0.02/GiB
    per month
    Backup
    $0.05/GiB
    per month
    Cross Region Replication Daily - Replication frequency is once a day
    $0.11/GiB
    per month
    Cross Region Replication Hourly - Replication frequency is every 1 hour
    $0.12/GiB
    per month
    Cross Region Replication Minutes - Replication frequency is every 10 mins
    $0.14/GiB
    per month
    Standard Storage
    $0.14746 per GiB
    per month
    Premium Storage
    $0.29419 per GiB
    per month
    Ultra Storage
    $0.39274 per GiB
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure NetApp FilesCenturyLink Public Cloud (discontinued)
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsAzure NetApp Files (ANF) cloud file storage service is charged per hour based on the provisioned ANF capacity. Customers can provision a minimum of 4TiB of ANF capacity and then add additional provision capacity in the increments of 1TiB. Cross Region Replication pricing varies by the desired replication frequency per unit of data, and the region of the destination volume.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Azure NetApp FilesCenturyLink Public Cloud (discontinued)
    Considered Both Products
    NetApp
    No answer on this topic
    Discontinued Products
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Azure NetApp FilesCenturyLink Public Cloud (discontinued)
    Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
    Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Azure NetApp Files and CenturyLink Public Cloud (discontinued)
    Feature
    Azure NetApp Files
    7.7
    8 Ratings
    7% below category average
    CenturyLink Public Cloud (discontinued)
    -
    Ratings
    Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime8.18 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dynamic scaling7.18 Ratings00 Ratings
    Elastic load balancing8.17 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pre-configured templates8.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Monitoring tools7.18 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pre-defined machine images8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Operating system support8.18 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security controls7.18 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automation8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Azure NetApp FilesCenturyLink Public Cloud (discontinued)
    Small Businesses
    IBM Cloud Object Storage
    Score9 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Object Storage
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers
    Score8.7 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SAP on IBM Cloud
    Score9 out of 10
    SAP on IBM Cloud
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Azure NetApp FilesCenturyLink Public Cloud (discontinued)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (8 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure NetApp FilesCenturyLink Public Cloud (discontinued)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    NetApp
    In my opinion, I would say it is more suitable to huge workloads, where you really needs the reliability and performance that a Netapp storage provides to you, larger share sizes, etc. Use cases where you really needs to store large amounts of non-structured data. It is not a cheap solution, I mean, you can find other options to store your data on the Cloud at smaller prices. So, for small companies, or companies that depends mostly on web-applications, or don't have such a specific requirements, I would not go with Azure Netapp Files.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    I believe for small to mid business application hosting Centurylink provides an adequate service. When moving to larger scale business enviornments I believe the limitations, slowness is going to become a problem
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    NetApp
    • We have found that it scales very well. In some cases we had a large existing storage infrastructure and were able to migrate it while other times we started from scratch with low storage demands and Azure NetApp Files fit the bill each time.
    • We have been impressed with the replication capabailities.
    • The read and write speed when interacting with files is a major asset.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • Offloading the requirements for hosting apps in house - cost savings
    • Access ability - users could access documents and programs from anywhere
    • Collaborative work ability - multiple users could work within the same enviornment
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    NetApp
    • It does not support file locking although its available as an add-on
    • Design is far from native and has a learning curve
    • We would like to have backup functionality built in so that we don't run into the issue where the replication process makes a copy of the corrupted data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • Perhaps ease of use - it's not convoluted but a little more streamlined of an interface would be great
    • Make your presence more known - in a world of heavily advertised cloud options CenturyLink is not at the top of the pile and I think it may be due to a lack of awareness in the business community. Advertise!
    • Streamline functionality - interface can be a little slow at times.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    NetApp
    Azure NetApp Files is very well integrated with Microsoft Azure, we use the same request methods that everyone knows from Azure. NetApp and Microsoft has built a very efficient solution that allows you to transfer virtually any service to the Microsoft public cloud. Azure NetApp Files also protects our data very well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    I did not select the application hosting environment - I was a user. That being said I do not have much of a voice in the difference between hosted services that I have experienced.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    NetApp
    • The main hurdle in promoting this solution is the price. Its price definitely requires an improvement. It is more expensive than other options, so customers go for a cheaper option.
    • Its security and ease of use are most valuable.
    • It is stable and scalable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots