Azure NetApp Files vs. Google Compute Engine
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Azure NetApp Files | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology, giving users the file capabilities in Azure that core business applications require, with pricing plans for different performance tiers. | $0.02 per month |
Google Compute Engine | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | Google Compute Engine is an infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) product from Google Cloud. It provides virtual machines with carbon-neutral infrastructure which run on the same data centers that Google itself uses. | $0 per month GB |
| Azure NetApp Files | Google Compute Engine | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Azure NetApp Files (ANF) cloud file storage service is charged per hour based on the provisioned ANF capacity. Customers can provision a minimum of 4TiB of ANF capacity and then add additional provision capacity in the increments of 1TiB. Cross Region Replication pricing varies by the desired replication frequency per unit of data, and the region of the destination volume. | Prices vary according to region (i.e US central, east, & west time zones). Google Compute Engine also offers a discounted rate for a 1 & 3 year commitment. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Azure NetApp Files | Google Compute Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 8 Answers | 98% Would buy again 45 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 44 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | 96% Happy with the feature set 44 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 91% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 31 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | 93% Implementation went as expected 41 Answers | |
| Azure NetApp Files | Google Compute Engine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Azure NetApp Files | Google Compute Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | IBM Cloud Object Storage Score9 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Object Storage Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Score8.7 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Score8.7 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SAP on IBM Cloud Score9 out of 10 | SAP on IBM Cloud Score9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Azure NetApp Files | Google Compute Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 8.9 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 6.9 |
| Usability | - | 8.1 |
| Availability | - | 9.6 |
| Performance | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 10.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 7.3 |
| Azure NetApp Files | Google Compute Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Google Compute Engine Screenshots |







