Azure Pipelines vs. CMake

Azure Pipelines

18 Reviews and Ratings

CMake

3 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Azure Pipelines	Score8.5 out of 10	N/A	Users can automate builds and deployments with Azure Pipelines. Build, test, and deploy Node.js, Python, Java, PHP, Ruby, C/C++, .NET, Android, and iOS apps. Run in parallel on Linux, macOS, and Windows. Azure Pipelines can be purchased standalone, but it is also part of Azure DevOps Services agile development planning and CI/CD suite.	N/A
CMake	Score8 out of 10	N/A	CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software. CMake is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files, and generate native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in a preferred compiler environment. The suite of CMake tools were created by Kitware in response to the need for a cross-platform build environment for open-source projects such as ITK and VTK.	$0

Pricing

Azure Pipelines

CMake

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
Azure Pipelines	CMake
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

No setup fee

No setup fee

—

—

Best Alternatives
	Azure Pipelines	CMake
Small Businesses	Apache Maven Score9.1 out of 10	Apache Maven Score9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Apache Maven Score9.1 out of 10	Apache Maven Score9.1 out of 10
Enterprises	Gradle Build Tool (Open Source) Score9 out of 10	Gradle Build Tool (Open Source) Score9 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Azure Pipelines	CMake
Likelihood to Recommend	7.0 (3 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Azure Pipelines	CMake
Likelihood to Recommend	Microsoft It is good tool if you are doing continuous improvements in your code and you wish it goes live whenever you push code to GitHub. So integrating Azure Pipeline, it automatically does CI/CD in the background once you push code/merge code and it is live in few minutes. It also does some automated tests if you have wrote scripts Incentivized Verified User Read full review	Kitware No answers on this topic
Pros	Microsoft Integration with SonarQube Integration with Azure DevOps Integration with GitHub Incentivized Matthew Budram Software Architect Read full review	Kitware No answers on this topic
Cons	Microsoft The errors which we got sometimes are not clearly enough. There are some let's say hidden options, they could be more visible When the process is running we have to remember about manually refreshing to see the current status because it doesn't work automatically Incentivized Verified User Read full review	Kitware No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Microsoft We have used the GitHub CI/CD. Earlier we were using the Azure Pipelines but after GitHub had their actions, we integrated that for CI/CD. It runs the tests and makes a production build which can be live. GitHub CI/CD is more useful because we have to make script only once then just by few changes we can deploy it onto Azure, AWS, Google anywhere so we found it more convenient Incentivized Verified User Read full review	Kitware No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Microsoft we have had outages from Azure in the past Incentivized Matthew Budram Software Architect Read full review	Kitware No answers on this topic
ScreenShots