TrustRadius

Azure Spring Apps vs. IBM Cloud Functions

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Spring Apps
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Azure Spring Apps is a platform as a service (PaaS) for Spring developers. Users can manage the lifecycle of Spring Boot applications with comprehensive monitoring and diagnostics, configuration management, service discovery, CI/CD integration, and blue-green deployments.
$0.29
per hour
IBM Cloud Functions
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Functions is a PaaS platform based on Apache OpenWhisk. With it, developers write code (“actions”) that respond to external events. Actions are hosted, executed, and scaled on demand based on the number of events coming in. No servers or infrastructure to provision and manage.
$0
per second of execution
Pricing
Azure Spring AppsIBM Cloud Functions
Editions & Modules
Basic
$0.288
per hour base price
Standard
$1.015
per hour base price
Enterprise
$2.03
per hour base price
Basic Cloud Functions Rate
$0.00017
per second of execution
API Gateway Rate
Free
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Spring AppsIBM Cloud Functions
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Spring AppsIBM Cloud Functions
Best Alternatives
Azure Spring AppsIBM Cloud Functions
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Spring AppsIBM Cloud Functions
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
3.0
(7 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Spring AppsIBM Cloud Functions
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
IBM
IBM Cloud Functions [is] not the worse product on the IBM cloud. I decided to write this review as I thought it would be balanced. I would still use functions to set up a serverless architecture where execution time is pretty quick and the code is relatively simple. I wouldn't use IBM Cloud Functions for async calls obviously, as costs could be higher. The functions documentation is lacking in terms of CI/CD, and there are unexplainable errors occurring - like the network connection that I mentioned. So I wouldn't just rely on IBM Cloud Functions too much for the entire system, but make sure it's diversified.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • Great substitute for a simple API calls to run non-complicated code.
  • Easy way to run Python/Java/Javascript to get something done.
  • File validation.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • Billing can be a hassle, not the most responsive customer service/support team
  • Handles & executes most functionalities, but other platforms offer more scalability if you're seeking consistent and stable growth
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • ICF is a lightweight service and does not require runtime configurations
  • Scalable on demand and hence there is no need to pay for runtime costs
Badheka, Amit | TrustRadius Reviewer
Badheka, Amit
Technology Architect
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • It directly affected our expenses since we do not need to deploy and maintain a set of separate applications.
  • It allowed us to pay for only the amount of time cloud functions run.
  • It saved on maintenance and monitoring of the applications it replaced.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots